Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  203 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 4: Inherited Benefits: Advising Executors and Beneficiaries

203

A.

Exception for certain fiduciary actions.

Thi

s ¶ 4.4.04 (

A) discusses whether a person who

is both a beneficiary and a fiduciary of the inherited property can disclaim an interest as

beneficiary despite having taken actions with respect to the property in his capacity as

fiduciary. For disclaimers by a fiduciary in his capacity as fiduciary see

¶ 4.4.08 (

B) (last

paragraph),

¶ 4.4.11 (

B), (C), and

¶ 4.4.12 (

B).

Actions taken by a person who is both a beneficiary and a fiduciary “in the exercise of

fiduciary powers to preserve or maintain the disclaimed property” do not constitute acceptance as

beneficiary. Reg.

§ 25.2518-2(d)(2) .

Shirley Example:

Shirley dies. Her will leaves her house to her three children A, B, and C, and

names C as executor. To fulfill his duties as executor under applicable state law, C arranges for

insurance, security, and maintenance for the house. These actions taken as executor would not

preclude his disclaiming his interest as beneficiary.

This exception can lead practitioners astray. This is a very limited exception for which the

IRS provides no examples in the regulations. The only fiduciary powers blessed are “to preserve

or maintain the disclaimed property.” Any exercise of discretionary powers to direct the enjoyment

of the property, even if exercised in a fiduciary capacity, would preclude a qualified disclaimer of

the property by the individual in his personal capacity, unless the exercise of discretion is limited

by an ascertainable standard.

¶ 4.4.08 (

B).

B.

Titling of account not determinative.

The fact that a retirement plan account is retitled in

the name of the beneficiary after the death of the participant does not in and of itself mean

the beneficiary has accepted the account. See Reg.

§ 25.2518-2(d)(4) ,

Example (6); PLR

8817061 (a surviving spouse’s filing an election to take a statutory share of the decedent’s

estate did not constitute acceptance of the statutory share; the spouse could disclaim part

of the statutory share); and PLR 9214022

( ¶ 4.4.05 (

B)).

Rachel Example:

Rachel dies, leaving her IRA (at Brokerage Firm X) to her husband Isaac. Isaac

informs Brokerage Firm X of Rachel’s death. Firm X retitles the account “Rachel, deceased, IRA,

for the benefit of Isaac, beneficiary.” Firm X sends Isaac paperwork explaining the account

agreement, its fees, and his rights regarding rollover and investments. If this is all that happens,

Isaac has not accepted the IRA. But: If Isaac gives Firm X any instructions regarding the account,

such as buying or selling investments, he has accepted the account (or at least those investments;

see above). If he takes a withdrawal from the account, see

¶ 4.4.05 .

If he names a successor

beneficiary for his interest, see “C.”

C.

Naming a successor beneficiary.

A beneficiary’s designating a successor beneficiary for

his interest in the account is probably not “acceptance,” unless the beneficiary dies while

that designation is in effect (

i.e.,

before he disclaims), in which case see

¶ 4.4.12 (

A). This

conclusion is reached by analogy from the way the regulations deal with a disclaimer by

the holder of a power of appointment: “The exercise of a power of appointment to any

extent by the donee of the power is an acceptance of its benefits,” says Reg.

§ 25.2518- 2(d)(1) ,

but this apparently does not include an executory exercise: See Reg.

§ 25.2518- 2(d)(4) ,

Example (7), in which B has a testamentary power of appointment under A’s trust,

and signs a will which would exercise the power, but then makes a qualified disclaimer of

the power before he dies (so the “exercise” is never activated).