304 / 328
belonged. He became dissatisfied with the conduct of
the Union and resigned from it. The Union anxious
to preserve the position that no non-member should
be employed in that office took energetic steps to
get the appellant to re-join, but he refused. As a
result of steps taken by the Union and its members
(including a threat by the respondents to break their
own contracts of service with B.O.A.C. unless
B.O.A.C.
terminated
the
appellants'
contract),
B.O.A.C. were
induced,
first
to
suspend
the
appellant, and then to terminate his employment
after giving him due notice. The appellant had no
remedy against B.O.A.C. as
it neither broke a
contract with him, nor committed any tort against
him.
The House of Lords decided that the threat by
the respondents in the employment of B.O.A.C.
to break their own contracts, although admittedly
in furtherance of a trade dispute, was an unlawful
means which deprived
the respondents of the
protection of sections i and 3 of the Trade Disputes
Act 1906. The decision in Cooper
v.
Millea and
Others
(1938. 1.11.749)
and Riordan
v.
Butler
(i94o.I.R.347) were applied Rookes
v.
Barnard (1964)
i All. E.R.367).
COMMISSIONERS'
FEES
The attention of members is drawn to S.I. Nos. 38
of 1964 relative to the above which may be pur
chased from the Government Stationery Office,
price <5d. These Rules make a number of amendments
of a miscellaneous nature in the Rules of the Superior
Courts (S.I. No. 72 of 1962) and, in particular,
prescribe the fees payable to Commissioners for
Oaths.
FEES PAYABLE TO COMMISSIONERS
FOR OATHS
£
s . d.
1. On taking an affidavit, affirmation
or declaration
...
...
...
50
2. On marking exhibits therein refer
red to and required to be marked—
for each exhibit
but not exceeding for all exhibits ...
2
i 10
o
o
REGISTRATION
OF
TITLE
ACTS,
1891 AND 1942 ISSUE OF NEW LAND
CERTIFICATE
Applications
have been
received
from
the
registered owners mentioned
in
the Schedule
annexed hereto, for the issue of Certificates of Title
in substitution for the original Certificates issued in
respect of the lands specified in the said Schedule,
which original Certificates, it is alleged, have been
lost or inadvertently destroyed.
A new Certificate will be issued in each case,
except a case in respect of which notification is
received in this Registry within 28 days from the
publication of this notice, that the Certificate of
Title is still in existence, and in the custody of some
person other than the registered owner. Any such
notification should state the grounds on which such
Certificate is being held.
Dated the 29th day of February, 1964.
D. L. McALLISTER,
Registrar of Titles
Central Office,
Land Registry,
Chancery Street,
DUBLIN.
SCHEDULE.
1. Registered Owner Martin Ryan. Folio number
9843. County Tipperary. Lands of Boolatin in the
Barony of Owney and Arra containing 15 za. 2r. 3 5p.
2. Registered Owner Robert Scanlon and Johanna
Mary Scanlon. Folio number 4407. County Wexford.
Lands of Brandane in the Barony of Bargy con
taining 2a. 3r. 5p.
3. Registered Owner Patrick Kilcullen. Folio
number 9294. County Mayo. Lands of Dooyeaghny
or Cloonloughan in the Barony of Tireragh con
taining 88a. 3r. i6p.
4. Registered Owner Patrick McLoughlin. Folio
number 5 5 9. County Leitrim. Lands of Cloonmeone
Lower in the Barony of Drumahaire containing
6oa. or. lop.
5. Registered Owner Mary Flood. Folio number
2775. County Longford. Lands of Mullinroe con
taining I2a. 3r.
i op. and Lands of Culleenmore
containing oa. 3r. 6p. both situate in the Barony
of Granard.
THE REGISTRY
REGISTER B
UNIVERSITY graduate, honours LL.B. wishes employment in
solicitor's office, Dublin. Highly recommended and hard
working. Replies to Box number 8.273.