Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  967 / 1851 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 967 / 1851 Next Page
Page Background

Radiotherapypluschemotherapywithorwithout surgical

resectionfor stageIII non-small-cell lungcancer:aphaseIII

randomisedcontrolledtrial

KathySAlbain,RSuzanneSwann, ValerieWRusch,AndrewTTurrisi III,FrancesAShepherd, ColumSmith,YuhchyauChen,Robert BLivingston,

RichardHFeins,DavidRGandara,WillardAFry,Gail Darling,DavidHJohnson,MarkRGreen,Robert CMiller,JoanneLey,WillliamTSause,JamesDCox

Summary

Background

Results from phase II studies in patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer with ipsilateral

mediastinal nodal metastases (N2) have shown the feasibility of resection after concurrent chemotherapy and

radiotherapywithpromisingratesof survival. WethereforedidthisphaseIII trial tocompareconcurrent chemotherapy

and radiotherapy followed by resection with standard concurrent chemotherapy and definitive radiotherapy without

resection.

Methods

PatientswithstageT1-3pN2M0 non-small-cell lungcancer wererandomlyassigned ina1:1ratiotoconcurrent

induction chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin [50 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 29, and 36] and etoposide [50 mg/m² on

days 1–5 and 29–33]) plus radiotherapy (45 Gy) in multiple academic and community hospitals. If no progression,

patients in group 1underwent resection and those in group 2 continued radiotherapy uninterrupted up to61Gy. Two

additional cycles of cisplatin and etoposide were given in both groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival

(OS). Analysiswasby intention to treat. Thisstudy isregisteredwith ClinicalT rials.gov, number NCT00002550.

Findings

202 patients (median age 59 years, range 31–77) were assigned to group 1 and 194 (61 years, 32–78) to

group 2. Median OSwas 23· 6 months (IQR 9· 0–not reached) in group 1versus 22· 2 months (9· 4–52· 7) in group 2

(hazard ratio [HR] 0· 87 [0· 70–1· 10]; p=0· 24). Number of patients alive at 5 years was 37 (point estimate 27%) in

group 1and 24 (point estimate 20%) in group 2 (odds ratio0· 63 [0· 36–1· 10]; p=0· 10). With N0 statusat thoracotomy,

the median OS was 34· 4 months (IQR 15· 7–not reached; 19 [point estimate 41%] patients alive at 5 years).

Progression-free survival (PFS) wasbetter in group1than in group2, median 12· 8months(5· 3–42· 2)

vs

10· 5months

(4· 8–20· 6), HR 0· 77 [0· 62–0· 96]; p=0· 017); the number of patients without disease progression at 5 years was

32 (point estimate 22%) versus 13 (point estimate 11%), respectively. Neutropenia and oesophagitis were the main

grade 3 or 4 toxicitiesassociated with chemotherapy plusradiotherapy in group 1(77 [38%] and 20 [10%], respectively)

and group 2 (80 [41%] and 44 [23%], respectively). In group 1, 16 (8%) deathswere treatment related versus four (2%)

in group 2. In an exploratory analysis, OS was improved for patients who underwent lobectomy, but not

pneumonectomy, versuschemotherapyplusradiotherapy.

Interpretation

Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without resection (preferably lobectomy) are options for

patientswith stage IIIA(N2) non-small-cell lungcancer .

Funding

National Cancer Institute, Canadian Cancer Society, andNational Cancer Instituteof Canada.

Introduction

survival rates that werehigher than expected.

11–13

However,

Lancet

2009;374:379–86

Published

Online

July27,2009

DOI:10.1016/S0140-

6736(09)60737-6

See

Comment

page359

LoyolaUniversityChicago

StritchSchool of Medicine,

Maywood, IL, USA

(Prof KSAlbainMD)

;Radiation

TherapyOncologyGroup,

Philadelphia, PA, USA

(RSSwann PhD, JLeyRN)

;

Memorial Sloan-Kettering

CancerCenter, NewYork, NY,

USA

(Prof VWRuschMD)

;

WayneStateUniversity,

Detroit, MI, USA

(Prof ATTurrisi III MD)

;

UniversityHealthNetwork,

PrincessMargaret Hospital

Site, Toronto, ON, Canada

(Prof FAShepherdMD)

;

TomBakerCancerCenter,

Calgary, AB, Canada

(Prof CSmithMD)

;University

of RochesterMedical Center,

Rochester, NY, USA

(Prof YChenMD)

;University of

ArizonaCancerCenter,Tucson,

AZ, USA

(Prof RBLivingstonMD)

;

Universityof NorthCarolina,

Chapel Hill, NC, USA

(Prof RHFeinsMD)

;University

of Californiaat DavisCancer

Center, Sacramento, CA, USA

(Prof DRGandaraMD)

;

EvanstonHospital of

Albain KS. et al. Lancet 2009;374

Role of Induction CT-RT: Lung Intergroup Trial 0139

429 Stage IIIA (

pN2

) patients

Group 1:

Cisplatin + Etoposide x 2

RT 45 Gy

Surgery

2 additional CT cycles

Group 2:

Cisplatin + Et poside x 2

RT 61 Gy

2 additional CT cycles