Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  497 / 1542 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 497 / 1542 Next Page
Page Background

6/3/2017

Treatment plan comparison for an abdominal lesion –

7 coplanar equi-spaced beams versus 5 non-coplanar beams

7 equi-spaced coplanar beams

5 non-coplanar beams

Solid lines: 7 coplanarequi-space d beams

Dashed lines: 5 optimized beams

While non-co-planar beams do offer

improvement in dose distributions,

Delivery times with standard linacs

needs to be considered

Courtesy of Uwe Oelfke

45

Experience is gold!

Planning studies are a good way of gaining experience.

Experience can be fed into

“Class solutions”

or automated planning

Beam orientation

Number of beams

Factors Affecting Optimization Results

Optimization algorithm and objective function

Optimization parameter and dose constraints

The inverse problem

46