Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  76 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

76

Risk of impaired ecosystem functioning and loss

of biodiversity due to wildfires.

Conservation of forest biodiversity and sustainable

forest management are considered in most national

legislation related to forestry and agriculture. These

do not, however, integrate climate change and

adaptation issues yet. Some countries pay particular

attention to forest fires as one of the biggest threats to

biodiversity and explicitly address this risk in their

national policies (BiH, Serbia and Croatia).

BioREGIO Carpathians was a transnational project

(2011–2013), which aimed to show how the

integrated management of the Carpathians’ natural

assets could boost both sustainable development

and ecological connectivity in the region. The

project involved 16 partners from 9 different South

European, Central and Eastern European countries.

The seven Carpathian Ministries of Environment

were observers to the project.

One of the main goals of the BioREGIO project

was to develop management approaches that

could facilitate coordination and cooperation

between the institutions, regional and local

authorities, and other stakeholders of protected

areas and natural assets. A special focus was

placed on the development of a methodology

for integrated forest management and integrated

wetland management.

Key activities of the project included the

identification

of

regional

development

opportunities; the development of financial

mechanisms and innovative economic tools

for protected areas, and common integrated

management measures. The project included

three pilot sites which together covered all five

Integrated management of biological and landscape diversity for sustainable regional development

and ecological connectivity in the Carpathians

Transboundary cooperation in the Carpathian mountain region

Carpathian countries. Each pilot site consisted of

two bordering protected areas:

• Duna-Ipoly National Park (Hungary) and

Poiple (Slovakia)

• Iron Gates Nature Park (Romania) and Djerdap

National Park (Serbia), and

• Maramures Mountains Nature Park (Romania)

and Carpathian Biosphere Reserve (Ukraine).

The project resulted in the enhanced management of

theCarpathianprotectedareas andnatural assetswhile

maintaining the biological and landscape diversity as

well as the ecological connectivity of its mountains.

The joint pilot actions involving a multitude of local

and regional stakeholders resulted in transboundary

agreements for long-term cooperation. Throughout

the project, the development of a joint biodiversity

geo-referenced web-based information system

provided a solid information basis for the decision-

makers at the national and transnational levels. The

Carpathian Integrated Biodiversity Information

System (CCIBIS) can be accessed at http://www.

ccibis.org/

and the BioREGIO Carpathians WebGIS

at

http://webgis.eurac.edu/bioregio/

For further general information, please visit: www.

bioregio-carpathians.eu

GOOD PRACTICES

• Limited regional/national policy coverage

for adaptation and biodiversity conservation

related to damage from wildfires

• Limited budget for specific adaptation

measures related to wildfires

• Lack of/limited institutional coordination

across sectors

Key Policy gaps:

Risk of loss of habitats and ecosystem services

due to flooding. Risk of loss of riparian habitats

and agricultural land due to flooding in

industrial hotspots.

The Framework Agreement on the Sava River

Basin (FASRB) between BiH, Croatia, Slovenia

and Serbia governs the coordination of activities

on conservation, protection, and improvement

of aquatic ecosystems of the Basin, as well as the

management of emergency situations. The Neretva

and Trebišnjica Management Project (NTMP)

(2008–2015) implemented in BiH and Croatia

aimed to improve transboundary water resource

management. Among its activities were enhancing