Image courtesy of REN
CAM.2: SHARE OF SECONDARY MARKET-TRADED BUNDLED CA-
PACITY TO SECONDARY MARKET TRADED UNBUNDLED CAPACITY
From the table below, it is obvious that the share
of bundled capacity reallocated due to second-
ary market trades is marginal at only 0.38%.
This is caused by the historical dominance of
unbundled capacity.
Before CAM NC entered into force, all contracts
were unbundled and the predominance of un-
bundled capacity is still very clear over bundled
capacity. At the same time, the offer of capacity
in the secondary market normally comes from
old contracts, and CAM NC only entered into
force in 2015.
In the past few years, there has also been a ten-
dency of network users booking capacity on a
short-term basis rather than long-term behav-
iour. Thus, long-term bookings are becoming
less common than before CAM NC came into
effect and hence, before the existence of bun-
dled capacity.
However, it is important to see that some
bundled capacity is already being traded on the
secondary market. The expectation for following
years is that this ratio will increase exponentially
since old unbundled contracts will end and po-
tentially become replaced by bundled capacity.
CAM.5
SECONDARY MARKET
BUNDLED CAP.
511.4 MWh/h/y
FIRM CAP.
135,329.1 MWh/h/y
RATIO
0.38%
Table 3
ENTSOG CAM NC Monitoring Report 2016 |
33