5 / 38
Overview of Implementation
status (survey + IP list)
This chapter provides an overview of the implementation status
of each Article of CAM NC at TSO level.
Questions were only asked that focussed on the mandatory
provisions for TSOs stipulated in each Article. Thus, Articles
containing no direct obligations or only optional requirements for
TSOs were not taken into consideration in the questionnaire.
The presented data was collected from 49 TSOs
(45 ENTSOG members, two associated partners
and two TSOs that are not ENTSOG members).
This report reflects the responses from 41 of
these TSOs. Out of the eight missing TSOs, five
TSOs are under derogation and three TSOs only
have IPs that are not relevant to CAM NC provi-
sions.
It must be mentioned that one of the 41 TSOs is
also under derogation but has already applied
some CAM NC Articles on a voluntary basis and
is therefore included in the analysis.
Table 1 shows the implementation status of the
mandatory CAM NC articles by TSOs while Table
2 provides data on how the relevant Articles are
being implemented at all concerned IP sides.
Both tables indicate the number of TSOs and
IPs that share an implementation status of each
given Article:
\\
Fully Implemented (FI): TSO has fully
implemented the Article;
\\
Not Implemented (NI): TSO has not fully
implemented the Article;
\\
Not Applicable (NA), meaning:
a) CAM NC is not applicable for
particular IPs
b) TSO is under derogation but has
applied some or all Articles of CAM NC
on a voluntary basis
c) Capacity was already fully booked
before CAM NC entered into force
The answers provided by the TSO under deroga-
tion but which had nevertheless voluntarily
implemented some CAM NC Articles are consid-
ered in the following manner:
a) If the TSO implemented the Article,
the TSO is included in the FI group;
b) If the TSO did not implement the
Article, the TSO is included in the NA
group since the TSO was not obligated
to implement the provision.
ENTSOG CAM NC Monitoring Report 2016 |
5