Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8-9 / 56 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8-9 / 56 Next Page
Page Background wiredInUSA - November 2014 8

9

wiredInUSA - November 2014

MAKING

THENEWS

The $1 billion cable

A NextEra Energy proposal to bring

energy into the Boston area would

involve the seabed burial of the 68-mile

520MW transmission line, at a cost of

around one billion dollars.

The proposal is competing with a

cheaper alternative to run just 25 miles

of transmission line, while making other

upgrades to help supply power to the

area, and for $350 million less than than

the seabed option.

Burying transmission lines is an expensive

operation, and NextEra subsidiary New

Hampshire Transmission must convince

regulators and lawmakers that the

added reliability is worth the extra cost.

National Grid and Northeast Utilities are

partnering on an alternative proposal

that would cost substantially less, and

both companies have a targeted

completion date of 2018.

The Boston Globe spoke with Boston's

chief of environment, Brian Swett,

who said reliability was a factor in the

decision. “My concern as the energy

official in Boston is not only how much my

ratepayers are paying, but how reliable is

that grid – what’s the percentage that it’s

on during storms?” Swett told the Globe.

“Down time costs my constituents, and

my taxpayers, money.”

NextEra is arguing that the competing

proposal would need to take some

active power lines offline during

construction and system upgrades,

meaning more expensive power will

need to be purchased. NextEra believes

that the final price tag on the National

Grid-Northeast Utilities proposal could

be substantially higher than advertised.

iredInUSA - October 2014 INDEX