Previous Page  219 / 250 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 219 / 250 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUS

T 1982

BOOK REVIEW

George Gavan Duffy 1882-1951, A Legal

Biography, by G. M. Golding. Irish Academic

Press, 1982 (xvi, 224p.) £15.00.

To write the life-story of a modern judge is a

daunting task. Because of the nature of his office a

judge is remote from the people and relatively remote

from the legal profession. He must not merely be

independent; he must be seen to be so. And the

manner of his life is such that a biographer is

deprived of those dramatic or eccentric touches

which enliven a story and make it racy of the soil.

Respectability is not a rich subject matter for

biography unless it is accompanied by genius or

sanctity.

Sir Jonah Barrington acquired popularity only after

he had been removed from the 18th century Irish

Bench for financial impropriety and thereby found

the time to write his delightful social memoirs which

won for him posthumous fame and a plaque on his

house in Harcourt Street, Dublin. Likewise Cicero is

more honoured for his philosophical essays than for

his speeches at the Bar or his public activities.

If Plowden, Coke and Davies have acquired a

noteworthy place in legal literature it is largely

because they initiated or developed the important

craft of law reporting at a time when the common law

was taking shape. And it is precisely within the

domain of the law reports that a good and learned

judge finds a permanent place for his legal opinions as

he endlessly pursues the elusive goddess of Justice

down the arches of the years and through the dark

undergrowth of modern commercial and industrial

life. The man himself may be dead and forgotten but

his judgments remain embalmed in their leather and

buckram tombs and consulted by students and

lawyers in their search for judicial precedent and the

application of

stare decisis.

Why then has Mr. Golding disturbed the peace

and rest of an Irish judge by writing his biography?

In the first place he

was

different. A son of Sir

Charles Gavan Duffy, the future judge was born in

Cheshire and educated in Nice and in England. His

defencc of Roger Casement cost him his partnership

in a firm of London solicitors and, after practising for

a brief period under his own name, he moved his

home permanently to Ireland and began to read for

the Bar. He became a member of the team which

negotiated the Anglo-Irish Treaty in 1921 and

became Minister for Foreign Affairs for a period and,

ultimately, President of the High Court.

Mr. Golding outlines the events of the early years

and the period of his parliamentary life up to 1923

with ample notes and references. The chapter with

most general interest for the legal profession,

however, is likely to be that dealing with his years as a

210

barrister before he was appointed a judge of the High

Court in 1937. It has been stated by an experienced

colleague that Gavan Duffy's most clearly distinctive

feature as a lawyer was his passionate devotion to the

advancement of human rights and the rights of

private citizens as against the executive authority. A

major essay which he published on the need for law

reform confirms this statement and distinguishes

him as a liberal and far-seeing judge.

In the essay he advocated the abolition of

primogeniture and the Royal prerogative. He called

for a reform of the law relating to charities and

adoption and the modernisation of company law and

arbitration. With keen foresight he also advocated

generally the legal-right principle in favour of a

testator's surviving spouse and, in the law of tort, he

sought the abolition of the action for seduction and

the clarification of the concept of concurrent

wrongdoers. Most important of all he would abolish

the 'last opportunity' rule, apply the rules of

contributory negligence and legislate for the survival

of certain causes of action on the death of a claimant.

Years later when most of these reforms have been

implemented one realises how profound was his

appreciation of the need for reform.

Mr. Golding humbly asserts that his book is

merely a modest judicial biography and that many

helpful guidelines were taken from earlier

biographical studies of judges. In particular he

acknowledges his debt to Mr. Vincent Delany who

had summarised the legacy of Chief Baron Palles in

relation to his contribution to the law. With the mass

of material available in the form of his judgments the

author considers that it would be presumptuous to

have even attempted to utilise them all in

endeavouring to analyse Mr. Justice Gavan Duffy's

legal method, philosophy or style. However these

judgments are considered at length in relation to the

common law of Ireland, emergency legislation,

judicial review and the Constitution and, finally, his

work as a Chancery Judge. All the celebrated cases

are discussed at length and several critical and even

controversial views are expressed. The author

considers that

Cook

-v-

Carroll

and

Schlegel

-v-

Corcoran and Gross

were regrettable judgments but

he is generous in his comment in relation to the latter

case. In the final analysis he considers that the judge

should be remembered as a Catholic gentleman in the

liberal continental tradition and for his great

contribution to the development of the Constitution.

Mr. Golding is a solicitor and is a lecturer in

Business law at University College, Dublin. One is

filled with admiration for the pains which he

obviously took during the period of research and for

the ability which he has shown in writing this book.

He had many interviews with judges and lawyers

during the course of his task and several of his

statements are the result of personal communication

with them. With thirty three pages of notes,

supported by the relevant authorities, and six pages