Previous Page  38 / 250 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 250 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1982

Value-Added Tax — Property

by

Patrick Fagan, Solicitor

Premliminary

The basic concept of the scheme administered on foot

of the Value-Added-Tax legislation has been with us

sufficiently long as not to demand (at least in the present

context) an analysis of its underlying philosophy. Its

particular application in the property field has,

however, a number of significant features and connota-

tions, and a brief outline aimed at identifying some of

the practical aspects of a fundamentally complicated

subject may be of assistance.

Preamble

In the terminology of the V.A.T. enactments, we are

here considering "immovable goods", which expression

is defined as meaning "land", but can, by and large, be

taken to include buildings and fixtures (though not

necessarily fittings). Like most Revenue Law we have to

grope and research before any kind of picture emerges.

The basic charge emanates from Section 2, Value-

Added Tax Act, 1972, the relevant part whereof, in its

amended form, stipulates that a tax shall be levied and

paid: -

"on the supply of goods and services effected

within the State for consideration by a taxable per-

son in the course or furtherance of any business

carried on by him and on goods imported into the

State".

Criteria

Taking the matter a step further, the general proposi-

tion would seem to be that a taxable supply of im-

movable goods arises under the V.A.T. code where a

party: -

(1) having an interest, (being, when created, for a

period of at least ten years) in land

(2) which has been developed in whole or in part since

31 October, 1972

or

in relation to which or to the development whereof he

became entitled to claim a deduction by way of tax

credit

(3) disposes of that interest or an interest derived

therefrom

(4) in the course or in furtherance of business

It can be stated with reasonable confidence that, under

ordinary circumstances, all the foregoing points must be

satisfied before there can be a V.A.T. liability. Exigibili-

ty can, however, also arise in other instances, the most

notable of which are certain licences, compulsory pur-

chases and transactions which are deemed to be "self-

supplies".

Examples

With a view to demonstrating the general principles

enunciated examples of a few specific property transac-

tions are given and the outcome thereof in the V.A.T.

context considered.

Sales

Builder A, owning a freehold or long-leasehold site,

on which he has constructed a dwelling house since 31

October, 1972 will (assuming the application of the

foregoing criteria) suffer a V.A.T. charge in respect of

the sale of such property. If his purchaser is a non-

trader, the tax element will presumably be allowed for

and absorbed in the contract price. The property will be

regarded as having passed out of the V.A.T. net, and

tax will not be chargeable on subsequent transactions,

unless an entitlement to a tax credit or deduction arises

by reason of further development or otherwise. The case

follows on lines similar to a purchase effected in a

Department Store by a non-trader.

Landowner B will incur a charge on the disposal by

him of sites, which he has had serviced post-31 October,

1972 in circumstances entitling him to a tax credit in

respect of the relevant works.

Suppose that the foregoing sites are acquired by Con-

tractor C with a view to constructing houses thereon for

resale, the V.A.T. payable by Landowner B on the

disposal thereof will probably be invoiced by him to

Contractor C, who will be entitled to a credit for same

and for the V.A.T. charged to him on building materials

and the like. Tie will, however, suffer tax on the sale of

each constructed house as in the case of Builder A

(supra).

Taking the last situation a step further, we find Con-

tractor C deciding to use one of the houses as his own

private residence (viz. appropriating same for a purpose

other than that of his business). This gives rise to a

charge on the grounds that the appropriation is deemed

to be a "self-supply" - as to which see further

hereunder.

Tax will

prima facie

be chargeable in respect of the

29