g a z e t t e
a p r i l 1982
apprenticeship (it is to be hoped) the apprentice will have a
little experience in a fairly large number of areas and
specific experience in a few areas of law.
Furthermore, courses have been set up in co-operation
with the universities and in co-operation with the judges
and public prosecutors. But those are aimed at more
experienced advocates. Naturally these older advocates
should also keep their know-how up-to-date and follow the
developments in law.
For this category the part-obligatory character of the
courses for apprentices does not apply and thus
participation is rather casual. This is an additional
problem for the Bar Association which for the time being
seems insoluble. Anyway the training of the young advo-
cates has the higher priority.
Thus, the training of the apprentice in the Netherlands
is still largely founded on the practical training within the
law firm. It still shows fairly large gaps, however, which
are only being partially patched by the external training
facilities, which for the time being are financed from the
annual contributions of the advocates. At the moment the
Bar is busy finding options to improve the training, both in
the form of a separate post-graduate curriculum for
advocates and in the form of an improvement of the
training facilities package during the apprenticeship
period. For this purpose, the co-operation of the
government, and particularly that of the universities, is
needed. A co-operation which has not been forthcoming
until now because of the lack of financial means.
Thus, for the time being the advocates themselves will
have to take care of, and to co-operate with, the training of
their young colleagues as far as it is financially and
practically within their power. •
Court Fees Increased
The following was issued to the media through the
Public Relations Committee on 29 March 1982:
"Government charges for starting an action in the
Courts»were increased today by between 25% and 33%.
"The new Stamp Duty for the issue of a writ to
commence an action in the High Court is now £31,
compared with £24 a year ago and £19 in March 1980.
For a Circuit Court action the initial duty is now £10,
increased from £7.50 a year ago and £6 in 1980; the
District Court charge will now be £2, double what it was in
1980.
"A Law Society spokesman said today that while the
increases may seem comparatively insignificant they are
an indication of the increasing costs being imposed by the
State on persons exercising their rights in seeking justice
through the Courts. He added: "It is vital that the State
should ensure that access to the Courts is available to
everybody, and this type of annual increase in the cost of
initiating an action could be a deterrent."
Matters of concern
Matrimonial problems will be the subject of the next
Law Society symposium, "A Matter of Matrimony", to be
held at Blackhall Place, Dublin, on May 29. Contributors
will be Mrs Kay Begg, Bristol Court Conciliation
Services;- District Justice Sean Delap; Alan Shatter,
Solicitor, and a psychiatrist, Dr Peter Fahy.
Solicitors are invited to attend and participate in the
discussions — formal and informal. Because accommoda-
tion and catering facilities are limited, members of the
profession who plan to attend should advise Miss Ann
Kane, Premises Manager, as soon as possible.
In Cork
Useful discussions followed the papers at the recent
symposium, "How Safe is your Food", held in Cork. Mr
Michael Enright, President, Southern Law Association,
and Mr Gerald J. M. Moloney, Solicitor, Cork, acted as
chairmen of the sessions. Mr Moloney, in closing th
symposium, answered a question about the Law Society's
sponsorship of such meetings by pointing out that the
profession has a caring role in society and therefore sees it
as a duty to provide opportunities for experts to present
their views on matters of public concern and the law's
relationship to them.
Speakers at the symposium were: Gerard Downey,
Senior Research Officer An Foras Taluntais; Denis
Greene, Solicitor; Lee Kidney, President, Hotel and
Catering Institute; Gerald Buckley, Chief Veterinary
Officer, Cork County council, and Mrs Mary Falvey,
Senior Health Inspector, Southern Health Board.
The participants included representatives of consumer
groups, the food industry, local authorities, UCC and the
Munster Institute. •
Practice Note
Issue of Motions for Judgment in Default
of Defence
From time to time solicitors for Plaintiffs issue motions
for judgment in default of defence, without any communi-
cation to the solicitor for the other side prior to the service of
the Motion papers. The council of the Society ruled as far
back as 1972 that a solicitor should notify his colleagues in
advance of the intention to issue the motion. The Society
feels that the issue is a matter of professional courtesy
between solicitors. •
CORRECTION
"Criminal Injury to Property" Jan/Feb Gazette, 1982
p. 5. The paragraph subheaded "Damage" should read as
follows: —
'Damage' includes the total or partial destruction of the
property and any injury thereto. Save where the unlawful
taking of property during a riot comes within the ambit of
section 6, there is no compensation for property merely
damaged though there is compensation for property stolen
and found damaged.
{Irwin
v
Sligo Co. Council
) [1957]
Irish Jurist Reports.
64