Previous Page  12 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

Autoantigen GADVaccine is Safe for Children at High Risk of

Type 1 Diabetes

Treatment with autoantigen-specific therapies such as alum-formulated glutamic acid decarboxylase is safe in children

at increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes, yet the vaccine does not prevent the development of the disease. This

conclusion, based on results of a randomized, double-blind, investigator-initiated trial, was presented at the American

Diabetes Association’s 77th Scientific Sessions, from June 9–13.

H

elena Elding Larsson, MD, PhD, of

Lund University, Sweden, explained

that glutamate decarboxylase, or

glutamic acid decarboxylase, is an enzyme

targeted by autoantibodies in individuals

who go on to develop type 1 diabetes.

Research has reported that injections of

glutamic acid decarboxylase may preserve

some insulin production for 30 months in

those with type 1 diabetes, yet this insulin

preservation had not been confirmed in

larger-scale studies.

Dr Larsson and colleagues set out to eval-

uate the effect of alum-formulated glutamic

acid decarboxylase on progression to type

1 diabetes in children with ongoing persis-

tent beta-cell autoimmunity as indicated by

multiple positive islet cell autoantibodies.

Diabetes Prevention-Immune Tolerance

(DIAPREV-IT) was the first prevention

study where alum-formulated glutamic

acid decarboxylase was given before the

onset of type 1 diabetes. Its goal was to

determine whether alum-formulated glu-

tamic acid decarboxylase is safe in children

at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes,

as an attempt to induce immune tolerance

earlier during the autoimmune process,

preventing or delaying the process lead-

ing to clinical type 1 diabetes.

Known risk factors for type 1 diabetes

include family history, genetics, geogra-

phy and age, with the highest incidence

of onset occurring in children 4 to 7 and

10 to 14 years of age.

The study was conducted from 2009 to

2017. The trial enrolled 50 children age 4-18

years, without type 1 diabetes, and who

harboured positive glutamic acid decarbox-

ylase antibodies and at least one additional

type 1 diabetes-associated autoantibody

(IA-2Ab, ZnT8R/W/QAb, or IAA).

The children were randomized to either

two injections of the previously tested dose

of 20 μg alum-formulated glutamic acid

decarboxylase administered as a prime-

and-boost at days 1 and 30 (no serious

adverse reactions have been observed

with this regimen) or two injections of

placebo.

Both intravenous and oral glucose toler-

ance tests were performed before the first

injection. Follow-up visits were conducted

every 3 months for 5 years, with the oral

glucose tolerance test repeated every 6

months and the intravenous glucose tol-

erance test repeated at each annual visit

during the study. Oral glucose tolerance

tests were also performed annually, and

intravenous and oral glucose tolerance

tests were alternated every 6 months.

Results indicated that it is safe to administer

alum-formulated glutamic acid decarbox-

ylase to children at high risk of type 1

diabetes. No significant preventive effect

was observed, however, in the small study

sample.

The group was composed of children with

both normal and impaired glucose toler-

ance on enrollment. These subjects were

known to progress to type 1 diabetes at

different rates, so it was not possible to

perform specific subgroup analyses.

No difference in adverse events or serious

adverse events were observed between

participants receiving placebo vs alum-for-

mulated glutamic acid decarboxylase.

Dr Larsson concluded, “Since our study

showed that alum-formulated glutamic

acid decarboxylase treatment is safe, we

want to explore this treatment further, either

in different doses or in combination with

other drugs, in prevention studies that may

impact patient care. For example, an option

is to use repeated, increasingly small

doses, as is common in classic immune

tolerance treatment for allergic symptoms.”

She added, “We collected a large number

of immunological samples from the study

that have yet to be analyzed to under-

stand the possible mechanistic effects of

alum-formulated glutamic acid decarbox-

ylase. These results will be important to

consider in developing new studies with

combination therapies.”

www.practiceupdate.com/c/54557

PracticeUpdate Editorial team.

© ADA/Rodney White 2017

CONFERENCE COVERAGE

12

PRACTICEUPDATE DIABETES