Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 79 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 79 Next Page
Page Background

6th ICHNO

page 27

6

th

ICHNO Conference

International Conference on innovative approaches in Head and Neck Oncology

16 – 18 March 2017

Barcelona, Spain

__________________________________________________________________________________________

and the use of gastrostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy

had a positive correlation (p=0.045 and p = 0.047,

respectively).

Conclusion

Both OS and PFS in our population were similar to current

literature. We found a significant correlation between

treatment features (use of gastrostomy, adjuvant

chemotherapy, infectious complications) and patients

features (weight loss) with survival outcomes.

PO-052 N2 node metastasis in squamous cancers of head

and neck: failure patterns and future management

S. Giri

1

, M.R. Kanakamedala

1

, S. Vijayakumar

1

, S.

Mangana

1

, E.L. Bhanat

1

, M.P. Giri

1

, M. Chhabria

1

1

University of Mississippi, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Jackson, USA

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate outcomes of patients with N2 Neck nodes from

Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers.

Material and Methods

Between 2009-2014, 172 patients were treated at our

center; 71 white, 98 African American (AA) and 3 other

races, with a median age of 55 yrs. The T stages were: Tx

5 (3%), T1 13 (7%), T2 45 (26%), T3 34 (20%), T4 75 (44%).

The N2 neck stages were: N2A 13(8%), N2B 67 (39%) and

N2C 92 (53%). The primary sites included: oropharynx 73

(42%), Larynx 39 (23%), Hypopharynx 17 (10%), Oral cavity

20 (12%), Nasopharynx 9 ( 5%), other 14 (8%). Treatment

consisted of Surgery followed by Radiation therapy (SRT)

for 41 (24%). The median radiation dose was 60 Gy in 30

fractions of 2 Gy once daily. All radiation therapy was

given by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).

Another 131 (76%) patients were treated by concurrent

chemotherapy and IMRT (CRT). The chemotherapy

consisted of either Cisplatin or Cetuximab. The radiation

dose was 70 Gy in 35 fractions of 2 Gy each. The minimum

follow up was 24 months.

Results

The overall local control (LC) in the neck for the entire

group is 147/171 (85%). The LC was 38/41 (93%) in those

who were treated with SRT and 107/131 (81.6%) in the CRT

group, which was not statistically significant. There were

no statistical differences between location of primary and

subsequent neck disease control.

32/172 (25%) developed distant metastasis (DM). In the

SRT group it was 6/41 (14%) and CRT 26/131 (19.8%),

which was statistically insignificant. There were no

differences between the various N2 groups. There was

also no correlation with failure at the primary site. The

DM rate was significantly worse in African Americans

(AA) versus white patients (p = 0.01). Patients who

developed metastatic disease did so within 18 months.

The disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at

3 years were calculated by Grays test and Log Rank Test,

respectively. The DFS for the entire group was 49% (95% CI

0.39-0.58). There were no differences between the

various N2 stages. The DFS was significantly worse in AA

(40%) versus white patients (62%) (p = 0.007). The OS was

71% for the entire group with no difference in OS by N2

stages. Similarly, there was no difference in OS between

AA and white patients (p=0.6).

Conclusion

We report on 172 patients with advanced squamous cell

cancer of the head and neck who underwent combined

modality treatment, which was tolerated well.

Patients with N2 neck disease have an excellent LC rate

with combined modality treatment; either surgery

followed by CRT or CRT alone.

AA patients have a significantly worse DFS compared to

the white patients. They also have a significantly

increased risk of developing DM.

Nearly a quarter develop DM with the majority having loco

regional control. These patients should be considered for

neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials.

PO-053 Impact of PTV coverage on local recurrences

and overall survival after IMRT for head and neck

cancers

L. Piram (France), T. Frederic-Moreau, J. Miroir, N.

Saroul, N. Pham-Dang, L. Berger, J. Biau, M. Lapeyre

1

Centre Jean PERRIN, Radiotherapy, Clermont-Ferrand,

France

2

CHU G. MONTPIED, Head and Neck Surgery, Clermont-

Ferrand, France

3

CHU ESTAING, Maxillo-facial Surgery, Clermont-

Ferrand, France

4

Centre Jean PERRIN, Medical Physics, Clermont-Ferrand,

France

Purpose or Objective

Intensity modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard

radiotherapy technique for head and neck cancer

irradiation. The International Commission on Radiation

Units (ICRU) recommends covering 95% of the target

volume with 95% isodose. However, this objective is not

always achievable due to organs at risk constraints.

Objective:

To assess the impact on local recurrences and

overall survival of high risk PTV (HRPTV) coverage by 95%

isodose among patients treated for a head and neck

squamous cell carcinoma, with simultaneous-integrated

boost-IMRT (SIB-IMRT) and bilateral lymph node

irradiation.

Material and Methods

From May 2011 to January 2014, 119 patients who

underwent RapidArc® SIB-IMRT were included in this

prospective evaluation (22 oral cavities, 58 oropharynx, 25

hypopharynx, 14 larynx). Sex ratio was 6.4, median age

was 61.5 years. Doses, delivered in 33 fractions, were:

post-operative HRPTV (38 patients): 66Gy; non-operative

HRPTV (81 patients): 70Gy; intermediate risk PTV: 59.4Gy;

low risk PTV: 54Gy. Age, sex, clinical stage, tumour

location, chemotherapy, overall treatment time and

HRPTV coverage (V95HRPTV) at 90 or 95% were studied.

Results

Among postoperative patients, local control after 2 years

of follow-up was 70% vs 100%, p = 0.0083 (V95HRPTV+/-

95%) and 40% vs. 90.7%, p = 0.0000052 (V95HRPTV+/-90%).

Two-year overall survival was 75% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.046

(V95HRPTV+/-95%) and 40% vs. 87.9%, p = 0.0030

(V95HRPTV+/-90%). Among non-operative patients, two-

year local control was 66.4% vs. 75.9%, p = 0.47

(V95HRPTV+/-95%) and 54.4% vs.74.6%, p = 0.15

(V95HRPTV+/-90%). Two-year overall survival was 57.1%

vs. 79.5%, p = 0.015 (V95HRPTV+/-95%) and 40% vs. 74.2%,

p =0.0040 (V95HRPTV+/-90%). With multivariate analysis,

V95HRPTV ≥ 95% was a prognostic factor of overall

survival, V95HRPTV ≥ 90% was a prognostic factor of

overall survival and local control.

Conclusion

High risk PTV coverage by 95% isodose affects local control

and overall survival. ICRU guidelines must be followed as

often as possible. When impossible, coverage must remain

above 90% of the high risk PTV so as not to compromise

local control and overall survival.

PO-054 Cisplatin use in UK head and neck cancer

management: a clinician survey of current practice

B. Foran

1

, J. Fenwick

2

, B. Byrne

2

, J. Christian

3

1

Weston Park Hospital, Oncology, Sheffield, United

Kingdom

2

Merck Serono Ltd- UK- an affiliate of Merck KGaA-

Darmstadt- Germany, Medical Affairs, Feltham, United

Kingdom