Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 79 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 79 Next Page
Page Background

6th ICHNO

page 39

6

th

ICHNO Conference

International Conference on innovative approaches in Head and Neck Oncology

16 – 18 March 2017

Barcelona, Spain

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

The results of this survey demonstrate that despite the

recognised fundamental importance of H&NC research to

care quality, many UK oncologists have limited or no time

specifically allocated to this in their job plan. Many are

not actively recruiting to national or local/non-portfolio

trials, although there is willingness for greater

involvement. The results provide useful insights into the

constraints in H&NC research currently faced by clinicians

within the NHS, which will need to be addressed in order

to facilitate H&NC research in the future.

PO-081 Recurrence analysis in head and neck squamous

cell carcinoma treated with adjuvant EUD-based IMRT

S. Welz

1

, T. Schönle

1

, D. Thorwarth

2

, D. Zips

3

1

Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Radiation Oncology,

Tübingen,

Germany

2

Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Biomedical Physics,

Tübingen,

Germany

3

Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Radiatio Oncology,

Tübingen, Germany

Purpose or Objective

Resected high-risk patients with squamous cell carcinomas

of the head and neck (HNSCC) experience local

recurrences in about 20% despite adjuvant radio- or

radiochemotherapy. There is a paucity of data concerning

the recurrence rates and sites in patients treated with

IMRT, especially when planned with a Monte-Carlo

algorithm based on an equivalent uniform dose (EUD)

approach. We analyzed our data in this respect.

Material and Methods

We included all HNSCC (oral cavity, oropharynx and

hypopharynx) patients from 2008 to 2012 who received a

resection and completed an adjuvant IMRT of 60 to 66 Gy

with or without a cisplatinum based chemotherapy. Follow

up visits were scheduled at least every 3 months including

CT scans. Recurrences were categorized as in-field,

marginal or ex-field.

Results

128 patients were included. Median follow-up was 24

months. 54% received adjuvant radiotherapy only, 46% had

radiochemotherapy. Locoregional control was 94% with 2%

only local, 2% local and nodal and 2% locoregional and

distant recurrence. Of the 8 local recurrences, 3 were in-

field, 4 were marginal and one was ex-field. Two-year

overall survival was 79%, disease-free survival was 86%.

Grade 1-2 acute toxicity occurred in 67% of the patients,

grade toxicity 3-4 in 30%.

Conclusion

Adjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy using IMRT with an

EUD based prescription is safe. Recurrences occur mainly

in or close to the tumor bed.

PO-082 Correlation between HI, GI, CI and Size of

Metastases for Linac-Based High Dose SRT / SRS

B. Tas

1

,

I.F. Durmus

1

, A. Okumus

1

, O.E. Uzel

1

1

Yeni Yuzyil University Medicine Faculty Gaziosmanpasa

Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate correlation between Heterogeneity Index

(HI), Gradient Index (GI), Conformity Index (CI) and size of

metastases

for

high

dose

Stereotactic

Radiotherapy/Radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) using Elekta Versa

HD

®

lineer accelerator with Agility

®

collimator system.

Material and Methods

Twelve patients with single metastases were used in this

study

.

For each of the patients, the target was defined on

CT-MR fused images.

Agility

®

Multi Leaf Collimator

system’s features were used for patients treatment

planning. Minimum segment width adjusted 0.5cm, grid

spacing adjusted 0.2cm and statistical uncertainty

adjusted 1%.

Patient’s treatment planning were

performed using Monaco5.1

®

treatment planning system

(TPS) with three or four non-coplanars 6 MV Flattening

Filter Free (FFF) beams by partial Volumetric Modulated

Arc Therapy (VMAT) tecnique for each patient. We

determined four different size of metasteses catagory

which are less than 0.5cc volume, between 0.5cc and 1cc

volume, between 1cc and 5cc volume and between 5cc

and 10cc volume. Also, five different plans were

performed for getting different HI for each patients and

maximum HI was restiricted 1.50.

Results

Correlations were determined between HI, GI, CI and size

of metastases. Also, new Plan Quality Index (pQI)

suggested for plan quality level of high dose Stereotactic

Radiotherapy/Radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) plans. The mean

lowest pQI was

determined 6.60±0.3 for less than 0.5cc

metastases volume, 5.28±0.7 for between 0.5cc and 1cc

metastases volume, 4.57±0.2 for between 1cc and 5cc

metastases volume and 3.29±0.2 for between 5cc and 10cc

metastases volume.

Conclusion

Ideal one is the lowest GI and CI for good quality plan but

GI and CI are not giving plan quality level exactly one by

one. Therefore, we could determine plan quality level of

treatment with pQI. Also, pQI depends on significantly size

and HI of metastases especially for less than 1cc volume.

When the metastases size is larger than 5cc, size of

metastases and HI is losing its importance for pQI. Based

on the correlation between HI, GI, CI and size of

metastases we have decided that pQI should be ≤ 7.0 for

less than 0.5cc metastases volume, pQI should be ≤ 6.0 for

between 0.5cc and 1cc metastases volume, pQI should be

≤ 5.0 for between 1cc and 5cc metastases volume and pQI

should be ≤ 4.0 for between 5cc and 10cc metastases

volume for linac-based high dose Stereotactic

Radiotherapy / Radiosurgery (SRT/SRT).

PO-083 Adaptative radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal

carcinoma

L. Farhat

1

, W. Mnejja

1

, T. Sahnoun

1

, F. Dhouib

1

, J. DAOUD

1

1

EPS HABIB BOURGUIBA, Radiotherapy, SFAX, Tunisia

Purpose or Objective

Adaptative radiotherapy is a modification of the initial

radiotherapy plan during the radiation course to re-

optimize the treatment to take into account the anatomic

variation such as the tumor response and weight loss.