Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 79 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 79 Next Page
Page Background

page 70

6th ICHNO

6

th

ICHNO Conference

International Conference on innovative approaches in Head and Neck Oncology

16 – 18 March 2017

Barcelona, Spain

__________________________________________________________________________________________

randomized trial with a large sample size should be

conducted to confirm our results.

PO-146 Radiotherapy in elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years

with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

E. Metcalfe

1

, D. Etiz

1

, A. Ozen

1

1

Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Radiation

Oncology, Eskisehir, Turkey

Purpose or Objective

To review survival outcomes and analyse the treatment

tolerance in elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years with head

and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with

radiotherapy (RT).

Material and Methods

Patients aged ≥ 70 years treated with radiotherapy

between 2005-2016 for HNSCC were retrospectively

identified. 2D conventional and 3D conformal

radiotherapy technique was used until 2015, and

subsequently patients were treated with IMRT. Outcome

measures were 1 and 2 year disease free survival (DFS),

and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate

analyses was performed for survival outcomes.

Results

A total of 96 consecutive ≥70 years and patients were

identified. Median follow up was 26 (range 3-125) months.

Median age was 78 years (range 70-97). 77/96 (80%) were

male and 30/96 (31%) were ≥80 years old. The primary

tumour location was larynx 63 (66%), pharynx 12 (13%),

oral cavity 11 (12%), other 10 (9%). Breakdown of TNM

stage were: T1 29 (30%), T2 15 (16%), T3 23 (24%), T4 29

(30%), N0 69 (72%), N1 11 (12%), N2 13 (14%), N3 3 (2%).

Surgery involved in 25 (26%) patients followed by adjuvant

RT. Curative RT was delivered to 61/96 (64%) patients with

median 66 (range 62-70) Gy and palliative RT were to

10/96 (10%) patients with median and 30 (range 30-39) Gy.

2D conventional, 3D conformal technique and IMRT were

used in 11 (12%), 60 (62%) and 25 (26%) patients

respectively. Concurrent platinum chemotherapy was

given to 6 (6%) of patients. Acute toxicity was seen in 86

(90%) patients (grade-1 75%, grade-2 10%, grade-3 5%).

Median 3 (range 1-10) days off in the treatment in 61 (64%)

patients. 82/96 (85%) patients completed their RT scheme

without any interruption.

71 (74%) patients experienced complete response. 1 and 2

years DFS for the all cohort was 61% and 56%, and OS was

84% and 78%, respectively. Radiotherapy technique did not

significantly affect the survival. In univariate analysis,

gender (female, p=0.01), advanced T stage (T2-4,

p=0.001) and N stage (N2-3, p=0.003) for DFS, and older

age (≥80 years, p=0.008), and advanced N stage (N2-3,

p=0,01) for OS had found the negative impact (Figure 1).

Stage 2-4 disease was found a poor prognostic factor for

DFS in multivariate analysis (p<0,05, Exp(β)=0,190, 95% CI

for Exp(β)=0,065-0,556).

Conclusion

Radiotherapy provides high rates of tumor control and

survival with reasonable toxicity, although the very low

concurrent chemotherapy usage in elderly patients aged

≥70 with HNSCC. Radiotherapy requires careful schedule

selection and follow-up in elderly patients aged ≥ 80

years.

PO-147 The ELAN program: Customised treatment of

SCCHN elderly patients according to geriatric

assessment

J. Guigay (France), C. Ortholan, H. Le Caer, S. Renard-

oldrini, X. Sun, L. Mayache-badis, L. Geoffrois, J.

Fayette, C. Even, D. Vansteene, Y. Pointreau, D. Schwob,

N. Vintonenko, C. Michel, J. Bourhis, A. Auperin, C.

Mertens

1

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Medical Oncology,

Nice, France

2

Princesse Grace Hospital, Radiotherapy, Monaco,

Monaco

3

Centre Hospitalier de la Dracénie, Medical Oncology,

Draguignan, France

4

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Radiotherapy,

Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

5

CHBM Site du Mittan, Radiotherapy, Montbéliard,

France

6

Gustave Roussy, Medical Oncology, Villejuif, France

7

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Medical Oncology,

Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

8

Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology, Lyon, France

9

Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau,

Medical Oncology, Nantes, France

10

Clinique Victor Hugo, Medical Oncology, Le Mans,

France

11

Gustave Roussy, Datamanagement, Villejuif, France

12

GORTEC, Clinical Research, Tours, France

13

GORTEC, Clinical Research, Nice, France

14

GORTEC, Radiotherapy, Tours, France

15

Gustave Roussy, Biostatistics, Villejuif, France

16

Institut Bergonié, Geriatry, Bordeaux, France

Purpose or Objective

Thirty percent of SCCHN occur in patients (pts) more than

70y; the main challenge in these pts is to balance the

benefit/risk treatment ratio regarding tumor related

symptoms. However, these pts are usually excluded from