Previous Page  12-13 / 38 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12-13 / 38 Next Page
Page Background

12|The Gatherer

www.wrays.com.au

| 13

Thomas Thurston

Managing Director of WR Hambrecht

Ventures and Founder and CEO of Growth

Science

In our recent Pioneer

podcast interview Wrays’

CEO, Frank Hurley spoke

with Thomas Thurston,

Managing Director of

WR Hambrecht Ventures

and Founder and CEO of

Growth Science about

his experience working

alongside Professor Clay

Christensen at Harvard

University and the ongoing

pressure to be innovative

in the current business

environment.

Frank: Thomas, you worked alongside professor Clay

Christensen at Harvard, who’s one of the experts on

disruption theory I understand. What was that like?

Thomas: Obviously Christensen’s extremely smart and well

credentialed but I think one of the things that surprised me,

or delighted me the most working with Christensen, is that

he’s one of the most humble, down to earth people you’ll

ever meet. You’d have no idea who you were talking to if

you were sitting next to him on the bus. He’s much more

interested in asking questions than he is about talking,

which is can be rare for a Harvard professor.

Frank: Is he practical or more abstract? Does he apply

his stuff?

Thomas: He often gets accused of being too theoretical,

but I find that he’s got a much deeper appreciation for

operations than most people think. He actually started a

ceramic high performance start up, before he became

a professor. It was quite successful and went public. He

knows what it’s like to run a business, and the stress of

trying to generate revenue. Where a lot of professors don’t

have that background.

I think he gets accused of being theoretical, and in reality

I think he’s a lot more practical than most of his peers.

Because he’s become so famous and well known, I think

people sometimes lump him in as a guru. When they

put him in this category of people and he gets accused

sometimes in academia of being too much flash and maybe

the inference is not enough substance.

I think what’s interesting is, he’s actually just a really good

scientist, and although he’s become famous, when you

look at his work he really has a deep appreciation for the

scientific method and what quality research looks like. He

follows it very closely. I think a lot of people have taken his

ideas and sort of bastardized them in other ways. His work

that he’s done directly is quite powerful.

I think in hindsight, the biggest takeaway from working

with Christensen was probably just shoving the scientific

method into my DNA. In other words, he really does

explicitly demand that you go through all the steps, all the

statistical tests and all the control tests. He really teaches

you what that is and why that’s important. I never would

have expected that that would have been the biggest

takeaway from working with him. I think ten years later,

that’s the one thing that’s shaped everything I’ve achieved

since then.