Previous Page  38 / 120 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 120 Next Page
Page Background

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland,

[JULY, 1914

Sargant, J., considered the facts leading up

to the action, and came to the conclusion

that there was such a reasonable probability

of Benetfink and Co. differentiating their case

at the trial from that of A. W. Carriage

and Co. as to justify them in putting in a

separate defence and employing a separate

leading Counsel at the trial, although as the

result of the evidence at the trial the case for

differentiation mainly

disappeared.

If,

therefore, it lay with him he should hold that

Benetfink and Co. were well advised

in

putting in a separate defence and employing

a separate leading Counsel;

but it was

contended on behalf of the plaintiffs that

under Order LXV., r. 27, regulation 8, he

was precluded from interfering with the

discretion of the Taxing Master on the point,

and a decision to that effect by Bacon, V-C.,

in

Beattie

v.

Lord Elbury

(1873), 29 L.T. 419,

(1873) W.N.

194,

on

the corresponding

twelfth rule of the old Consolidated Order

XL. was relied on ; but in the later case of

Ager v. Blacklock & Co.

(1887), 56 L.T. 890,

Kekewick, J., decided that the question was

not purely a question for the discretion of the

Taxing Master, and directed a review of the

taxation, and His Lordship preferred to

follow the later authority.

Boswell

v.

Coaks

(1887), 36 Ch. D. 444, was also referred to,

but that was not a decision under the rule

now in question but was a case in which the

House of Lords had in fact delegated its

own jurisdiction as to costs to the Taxing

Master. His Lordship accordingly directed a

review of the taxation on the lines he had

indicated.

(Reported [1914]

Weekly Notes,

293.)

Actions concerning Charities.

THE Master of

the Rolls

recently drew

attention to the provisions contained in

Section 4 of 30 and 31 Victoria, Cap. 54,

which directs that no action can be com

menced by any person concerning any relief,

order, or direction relating to any charity,

without giving notice in writing to the

Commissioners of Charitable Donations and

Bequests. His Lordship stated that in future

he would deprive the plaintiff's Solicitor of

costs in any case in which it was necessary to

serve the notice and notice had not been

served.

ALL communications connected with THE

GAZETTE (other than advertisements) should

be addressed to the Secretary of the Society,

Solicitors' Buildings, Four Courts, Dublin.

THE GAZETTE will accept advertisements for

sale and purchase of property, loans, securities

offered, and money for investments on mort

gages, partnerships, clerkships, and generally

such advertisements as would be of service to

the members of the Society and theProfession.

Communications as to advertisements should

be addressed

to Messrs. Hely's Limited,

28 Dame Street, Dublin.

MR. W. P. KELLY,

SOLICITOR,

Has changed his Registered Address

FROM

61 BLESSINGTON STREET

TO

1 4 FLEET STREET, DUBLIN.

Dublin: Printed by HELY'S LIMITED, at the Acme Works, Dame Court, Dublin.