Previous Page  60 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

56

The Gazette ol tbe Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[JANUARY, 1917

Recent Decision affecting Solicitors.

(Notes of Decisions, whether in reported or

unreported cases, of interest to Solicitors, are

invited from Members.)

COUNTY COURT.

(Before the Recorder of Belfast).

SHEAN AND DICKSON

v.

FOSTER.

Belfast, January 19, 1916.—

Solicitor—Bill of

Costs

Withdrawal—Second Bill of Costs.

In proper circumstances a bill of costs served

by a Solicitor upon his client may be with

drawn, and a bill of costs drawn according to

the scale fee substituted for it.

Remitted action tried before the Recorder

of Belfast (Judge J. Walker Craig, K.C.).

The facts were as follows :—The plaintiffs

were a firm of solicitors who had acted for

the defendant in the attempted purchase of

some property. The purchase fell through

at the last moment before completion owing

to the vendor's refusal to comply with a

requisition. The negotiations had previously

been protracted, and the work heavier than

usual. On August 30, 1913, the plaintiffs

drew a bill of costs against the defendant,

called herein " the first bill." This bill was

for £15 Os. 6d., and consisted of £9 15s. 6d.

for outlay and £5 5s. for professional charges,

and was sent to defendant on September 15, •

1913.

After

various

applications

the

plaintiffs wrote to the defendant on July 3,

1914. saying that if payment were not made

by July 9, 1914, this offer would be with

drawn and the costs furnished on the usual

scale charges, and payment of same at that

rate insisted on. No notice being taken of

this warning, the plaintiffs proceeded to draw

a regular bill of costs.

In so doing they came

to the conclusion that the vendor was liable

for £6 12s., part of the outlay charged in the

first bill. On August 18, 1914, they wrote

defendant telling her of this fact, and offering

without prejudice to take payment of the

balance due under the first bill in full settle

ment if payment were made within a week.

No reply was returned, and ultimately the

bill of costs drawn to scale to £29 15s. 5d.

was furnished on November 3, 1915. The

plaintiffs subsequently issued a writ, which

was remitted by consent.

The defendant

claimed to be entitled to treat the first bill as

alone valid and subsisting, admitted liability

thereunder, and paid into court

£8

19s.

H. M. Thompson, for the plaintiffs.—The

first bill was not a bill within the Solicitors

Act, 1843, s. 37.

All the items were not

charged in'--a taxable shape, nor did it give

sufficient materials for getting advice on

taxation :

Philby

v.

Hazle,

8 C. B. N. S. 647 ;

Wilkinson

v.

Smart,

24 W. R. 42

;

Re

Tilleard,

32 B. 476. Even assuming that it

is such a bill, the solicitors may withdraw or

amend it, for there has been no order or

request to tax the bill, and they have acted

with perfect fairness :

Re Chambers,

34 B.

177 ;

Lumsden

v.

Shipcote,

[1906] 2 K. B.

433.

P. L. McCorry, for the . defendant.—The

general rule is that a' solicitor is bound by

his first-oil! of costs, -said will not be allowed

to amend or with/ uw it ;

and there is

nothing here to prevJit the application of

that rule :

Re Thompson,

J3Q_ C. D. 441 ;

Re Heathe,

L. R. 5 Ch. Ap .

694.

The Recorder of Belfa

v ".Id that in the

circumstances of the cas

he plaintiffs were

entitled to withdraw the arst and furnish the

second bill, and gave a decree for the amount,

subject to taxation, bo'ul''r»ills to be brought

before the Taxing Master, and credit being

given for the money paid into court.

The

following order was accordingly made :—

Decree for plaintiffs imount to be ascertained

by

taxation of

the bill of costs, dated

November 3, 1915, and the-ibill or note of

costs of August 30, 1913, both to be sub

mitted to the Taxing Master ;

but the fact

of a decree having been granted implies, and

is to be taken to imply, that the plaintiffs

were not bound by the said bill or note of

August 30.

(Reported I.L.T.R., Vol. L.,

235).

ALL communications connected with THE

GAZETTE (other than advertisements) should

be addressed to the Secretary of the Society,

Solicitors' Buildings, Four Courts, Dublin.