Previous Page  43 / 240 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 240 Next Page
Page Background

pressures from payers to remain competitive. Reim-

bursement systems are changing under the Current Pro-

cedural Terminology and International Classification of

Diseases systems toward bundling procedures and

disease-based and/or patient outcome strategies.

17

The practice of otolaryngology and many other sur-

gical specialties continues to rapidly change. New proce-

dures, not anticipated even 20 years ago, are now

performed by a variety of surgical specialists. The practi-

ces of head and neck oncologic and endocrine surgery,

skull base surgery, neuro-otology, and pediatric otolaryn-

gology have continued to develop, increasing the scope

and demand for otolaryngologists. New technology and

procedures, along with changes in surgical training

pathways and certification, have resulted in changing

referral patterns and a redistribution of surgical

specialties.

This rapidly changing landscape requires a compre-

hensive systematic analysis to assess the current

strength of the otolaryngology workforce, not only in

sheer numbers but in type of practice, distribution, and

productivity. The current patient need for otolaryngology

services must be assessed, and the current infrastruc-

ture of health care delivery and patient access must be

analyzed. These are the building blocks to begin to make

predictions of future need. The use of predictive models

can then be developed and tested to guide us in the

numbers needed and the way we train our students and

residents. The goal is to guarantee our ability to deliver

quality otolaryngology health care to the US population.

Models for Future Prediction

This article elected to use the Clinical Specialty

Supply Model to estimate otolaryngology future work-

force numbers. This is arguably one of the simpler for-

mulas to use and is not the only way a specialty should

assess their future workforce. Kim et al.

9

proposed three

models to calculate demand to make a “best estimate”

for the future. The first two methods used data obtained

from the ACS Health Policy Research Institute’s publica-

tion,

The Surgical Workforce in the United States

, which

draws mainly from the AMA Physician Master File and

AAMC Data Warehouse.

Method 1: Demand was extrapolated into the future

based on a continuation of the number of otolaryngolo-

gists per 100,000 population over the period 2004–2008

(current demand ratio). It depended solely on population

growth.

Method 2: Demand was estimated by maintaining

the per capita supply of otolaryngologists from the past

5 years (2004–2008) but only for the insured population

(current insured demand ratio). It assumed a gradual

increase in coverage, achieving full coverage in 2020, as

the Congressional Budget Office assumes a reduction in

the uninsured population by 32 million by 2019.

18

Method 3: Demand was extrapolated using two

models described by Cooper et al.

19,20

The first was

based on the established historical relationship between

gross domestic product (GDP) and health care spending.

They assumed that for every 1.0% growth in inflation-

adjusted GDP, the demand for physician services would

increase by 0.5%. GDP was extrapolated at a historical

average growth rate of 4.4%. The second model was con-

structed based on predicted demand of the stated health

care reform goals (growth to decline from its historic lev-

el of 2.5% above GDP to 1.0% above GDP between 2010

and 2020).

Regardless of which model is used, there is a signif-

icant gap between supply and demand for all years, with

an increasing gap through 2025. This gap persisted

despite manipulation of the extrapolation data to include

an increase in number of residents trained, decreased

resident training time, adjustments to current physician

workload, or the addition of nurse practitioners and PAs.

The gap increased markedly when expansion of care sec-

ondary to the ACA was factored.

A number of online tools have been developed to

forecast the future workforce. Examples are the AMA’s

Health Workforce Mapper

(http://www.ama-assn.org/ ama/pub/advocacy/state-advocacy-arc/health-workforce- mapper.page)

and the FutureDocs Forecasting Tool

(https://www2.shepscenter.unc.edu/workforce/

).

These

tools give the user the ability to manipulate estimates of

supply and demand for health care services for many

types of services for different geographic regions at var-

ied future periods.

Forecasting Methods and Implementing Policy

Based on These Predictions

The work of forecasting the future heath care needs

of a population is complex. Many unknowns conspire to

make this process a difficult task, but physician input

and accurate workforce planning are essential to ensure

a supply of physicians adequate to meet the US popula-

tion’s future health care needs.

Two unprecedented unknowns are the effects of the

ACA and America’s aging population. The ACA is

expected to expand health insurance coverage to an esti-

mated 30 to 47 million previously uninsured persons

over the next few years.

21

At the same time, physician

shortages are expected to worsen across the nation.

According to the AAMC, a shortage of more than 90,000

doctors, including 45,000 primary care physicians and

46,000 surgeons and specialists, is likely to occur in the

next 10 years.

It is estimated that approximately one-third of phy-

sicians could retire in the next decade, contributing to

the concern that the current supply of physicians will

not be able to meet the growing demand for care.

22

It is also believed that the US population is expect-

ing and using health care more than in the past. Work-

force planning today must take into account the

increasing demand on health care services per capita. In

an analysis in

Health Affairs

,

23

Grover and Niecko-

Najjum predict that physician workforce proposals that

rely exclusively on implementing new models of care or

changing the distribution of medical specialties to

address shortages are likely to fail in meeting the health

care needs of a growing, aging population unless the

number of physicians is increased. The authors believe

Laryngoscope 126: October 2016

Hughes

et

al.: Otolaryngology Workforce

Analysis

21