©1998‐2012 Elliott Affiliates, Ltd. and may not be duplicated by any means.
CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Page 5 of 10
FINDINGS: BY TYPE OF ROOM
CLEANLINESS APPEARANCE
With a goal of a 100% perfect (defect-free) room, it was quickly evident that cleanliness appearance
levels varied by type of room using the current ionized cleaning strategy. While the ionized device
removed much of the bio-film soiling quickly, visible soiling levels within the rooms studied exhibited
only a fair overall level of cleanliness appearance of acceptability.
So, we start with a variety of acceptable and unacceptable room-based cleanliness appearance
levels. These levels include a number on non-related surfaces and items NOT cleaned by the ionized
product, such as floors, baseboards, lights, furniture, as well as excluded cleaning activities, such as
project deep cleaning, litter, dust, floor polishing, etc. All of these contribute to a low level appearance
and are not reflective of any sanitizing issue. It is
room-based
cleanliness appearance profile that
serves as a backdrop for the comparative study that follows.
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Chart 1: Cleanliness Appearance
Overall, the Somerset Academy
ionized cleaning strategy delivered
a “Fair” cleanliness level, with the
highest appearance level occurring
in Classrooms and Restrooms, while
the lowest cleanliness appearance
levels occurring in the Cafeteria.
This is a good example for asking
the question:
Is there a difference
between looking “clean” and being
sanitary?