Page 94 - Alpha Tech Pet, Inc. - Distributor Support Binder (April 2013)

©1998‐2012 Elliott Affiliates, Ltd. and may not be duplicated by any means. www.ealtd.com
CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Page 7 of 10
Tersano LotusPro vs. Ionized Water by Type of Room
For each of the rooms tested, the LotusPro unit ATP reduction was compared to an ionized water
toxic-free cleaning strategy. In this comparison, the raw ATP count was used as an indicator for the
ATP reduction performance of each cleaning alternative.
The Table below presents the percent ATP for the Room types measured during the conduct
of this study. Overall the data shows an over 800% greater level of organic load for the
ionized water alternative.
Rooms Studied LotusPro
Ionized
Water
Auditorium 8.3 199.0
Cafeteria 25.0 248.0
Classroom 23.3 201.0
Corridor-General 61.7 212.0
Elevator 34.5 84.0
Elevator Lobby 13.0 262.0
Rest Room 18.6 272.0
Average 26.3 211.1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
ATP
Chart 3: ATP Levels for Rooms
LotusPro vs. Ionized Water
LotusPRO
Ionized Water
The findings for ATP residual,
after cleaning with the
ionized strategy vs. the
LotusPro Aqueous Ozone
process, showed a
consistent pattern of
greater organic reduction
for the LotusPro
approach.