133 / 154
ENTSOG TYNDP 2017 Public consultation questionnaire
Q48:
Do you have suggestions on how ENTSOG could
improve the stakeholder engagement process?
Yes,
If so, please specify below:
The stakeholder engagement process has already
improved for TYNDP 2017. We look forward to
engaging on TYNDP 2018. In light of the recent
priority given by the Commission to ensuring
infrastructure spend is in line with the EU's climate
and energy targets, it would to see a strengthened
representation of stakeholders advising on climate
change perspectives.
Q49:
On which topics do you consider ENTSOG would need specific stakeholder engagement?
Compliance with long-term European climate and energy objectives
Gas demand scenarios
GHG emissions from gas
Biogas supply scenarios
Q50:
This process has already started, with a public
consultation (12 May – 12 June 2016), workshops (2
June and 5 July 2016) and a Webinar (10 October
2016). Have you been involved in this process?
Q51:
As part of this process, ENTSOG intends to
provide the TYNDP 2018 demand and supply elements
as part of the joint ENTSOs Scenario Report, planned
to be released mid-2017 for public consultation. Do
you support this approach?
Yes
Further comments:
The current scenario development process is
designed as a bottom up process based on Member
State submissions. We welcome the intent to make
sure that gas and electricity scenarios are aligned.
We recommend: - To ensure that there is at least
one scenario that also reflects the EU’s international
commitments under the Paris agreement. - Energy
security is an important question for the European
Union’s energy sector as a whole as net imports are
still on the rise and overall 53.5% of gross inland
consumption of energy is imported As domestic gas
production has been falling, the TYNDP gas has
focussed much on diversification of import sources to
increase energy security. For over a decade,
renewables have been the only sector to increase
domestic production, making up for nearly 90% of
the lost domestic generation from other sources
between 2005 and 2015 (Eurostat). A joint scenario
development thus provides the opportunity to look at
energy security not only from the perspective of
diversifying import sources, but also including
increasing domestic production and reduction
domestic demand as additional variables.
Q52: For which supply source do you expect to need
the most intense stakeholder involvement?
Q53: TYNDP uses publicly available information to
build supply potentials. Would you have specific
suggestions on publicly available information ENTSOG
could use? Which supply source(s) would that cover?
Q54: Do you have any views how to plan for the
stakeholder engagement on supply potentials based
on the TYNDP 2017 material?
Q55: Would you see additional elements regarding
infrastructures that could be included in TYNDP 2018?
Respondent skipped this
question
Respondent skipped this
question
Respondent skipped this
question
Respondent skipped this
question