Previous Page  93 / 270 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 270 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY-AUGUST

from the true facts as to lead one to the conclusion that

this belief is based on ill conceived notions, or is the

consequence of uninformed comment of a most harmful'

nature.

Statistics are available to show clearly that the vast

majority of farms have an area of 50 acres or less and a

very large percentage are under 30 acres, the smaller

farms being usually found north west of a line drawn

approximately from Dundalk to Limerick, with some

exceptions. Since 1930 there has been a slow, but

nonetheless significant change in the structure of farms.

The number of farms of 30 acres and less have decreased

on average by 12 per cent and the larger farms over acres

have decreased in number. There has been approximately

a 15 per cent increase in the number of farms in the

region of

acres to

acres.

Underutilization is greatest in areas where the average

farm is between 20 and 30 acres.

CON-ACRE AND GRAZING

Over the years the area of lands set out in con-acre or

for grazing has averaged around 6% of all farmland.

The existence of a con-acre and grazing system on the

eleven months basis is proof, if proof be needed, on the

one hand of the reluctance of land owners, who for one

reason or another are unable to farm themselves, to sell or

dispose of the farm and on the other hand is proof of the

availability of young hard working eager farmers, who

are prepared to rent lands to enlarge the area they farm

and thus make their farming enterprise more economical.

The cost of land in recent years has also made the con-

acre grazing eleven month system attractive to the two

parties involved. Letting out land in this fashion is bad in

the long run, in that the land runs down in quality, due to

over-cropping or grazing with the owner and the occupier

each as a rule failing to put anything back into the land in

the nature of fertilising or in improving or creating greater

utilization.

It is clear from the many reasons mentioned that ways

and means must be found whereby our land can be put to

greater and more extensive use and whereby the

reluctance to dispose of land and the problems of the

family farm can be surrmounted. How can this be

achieved and what part, if any, can we as Solicitors play?

By reason of the possessiveness to which I have referred,

I believe that any attempt to have owners of under-utilized

lands part with ownership, either by offering incentives,

pensions or using compulsory purchase powers, or by

limiting the area of land which any one person may own,

will fail.

FARMINGCOMPANIES

The legacy of land law which I have already referred to

is still on our Statute Books and does not enable a land

owner to lease land with any great confidence or degree of

certainty that by doing so he will retain ownership, or the

right to repossess fully the property leased. Our tax laws,

as presently structured do not encourage the formation of

Limited Companies for the ownership, or indeed for the

farming of lands. There is a case to be made for farming

Companies, provided the tax structures are altered and

provided that farming is approached from tax purposes

by the Revenue Commissioners as a business and is

treated in the same fashion as any ordinary business

enterprise.

PARTNERSHIPS

We are therefore left with partnership, which while it

may seem to be Hobson's Choice in the circumstances,

has nonetheless many attributes which can provide a

reasonable solution to the many problems mentioned. A

partnership arrangement can be in many varied forms to

suit the circumstances of the particular case, it can be for

a short trial period, it can be extended, should it fail, or if

difficulties should arise by virtue of the incompatability of

the partners it can be terminated on terms which have

already been mutually agreed. It can be between two or

more parties and there is a whole wide range of variations

to suit all circumstances. There are countless people in all

walks of life who carry on various types of business

enterprise in partnership with a very full and rewarding

involvement and with a measure of success to the benefit

of all of the parties involved. There is no reason to my

mind why the farming community should not be equally

successful, especially the younger landless farmer, who is

as astute and able a businessman as most.

If a parent and son or daughter operate a farm on a

partnership basis, the land owner or parent contributing

the land, but the ownership of which he retains, and he

also contributing his expertise and such work as he may

be capable of, depending on age and the younger person

contributing his ability and eagerness to work, both

sharing the profits of a profitable enterprise; must lead to

a happier and a more contented farming family than now

often exists, particularly where a son is merely working at

home in receipt of a weekly allowance with no say or

standing.

As between local farmers two or even more who have

small holdings, the advantages are obvious. The batchelor

farmer, or the farmer who through age, illness or who is

otherwise unable to utilize his lands fully could, by way of

partnership with a younger man achieve satisfaction and

a greater income through the full utilization of his

property. The consequent sharing of expense and farm

implements will be advantageous. The land owning

farmer also has the assurance that his ownership of the

land does not become involved in any way and after a

trial period of operation, a decision can be arrived at as to

whethere the junior partner in the arrangement should

have options or arrangements, permitting him in due

course to purchase the ownership from his co-partner.

I am glad to say that there has been great co-operation

between the I.F.A., the A.C.C. and the Society over the

past year and this matter has been under active

consideration. Recently Macra na Feirme have indicated

to the Society that they would welcome a meeting to set

up a Committee to consider in particular partnership

arrangements in farming and a meeting will take place

shortly. From the practical steps which are in mind, each

of us in our own way, can encourage farmers where

necessary, in the settlement of their affairs to consider the

partnership idea and we can encourage them to do so and

in that respect we should be in a position to provide suit-

able forms of partnership agreements when required and

to advise fully in relation to all aspects of these matters.

The idea of farming in partnership is new to the

farming community, who heretofore have operated as

very independent indivualistic persons, each paddling his

canoe to the best of his or her ability. It will therefore take

time before the confidence necessary to engage in

partnership arrangements grows and in that respect,

perhaps a beginning could be made with the family farm.

87