172 / 172
EXPERT REVIEW PANEL (ERP) FOR FERTILIZERS
**. V1
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION
1)
Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented
2)
No – I disagree that the proposed changes can be implemented.
3)
Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14.
4)
Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14.
Please explain and delineate for scientific reasons
1)
The data from the revise method is compared with AOAC Final Action Method 2003.14
2)
These modifications do not alter the validated performance of the method.
Please explain the additional revisions:
1)
The modifications to the method to validated by comparative data between the revised AOAC OMA
959.03 and 2003.14 which is final action HOLC method
2)
On page 1476, in the second paragraph after Experimental-->Materials-->(l), the last sentence "Analytical
results, means, and standard deviations are shown in Table 1" should be Table 2.
On page 1477, the last sentence of Apparatus-->(a) "Instrument operating conditions are listed in Table
2" should be Table 1.
On page 1480, the last sentence of paragraph 6 "...the Urea-triazone liquid solution containing mixed
compositions of urea forms and triazone moieties (Table 1)" should be Table 2.
RECOMMENDATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION LEVEL
1)
Minor Modification
2)
Editorial Change
3)
Minor Modification
4)
Minor Modification