CONCLUSIONS
• Modern intracavitary applicators
• Same concept as historical systems; main differences:
• CT, MRI compatibility, materials
• Fixed, adjustable components
• Smaller channel diameters
• Main types of intracavitary applicators:
• Tandem & ring (Stockholm style)
• Tandem & ovoids (Manchester or Fletcher style)
• Mould technique
• Intracavitary technique alone:
• limited possibility for D adaptation
• Interstitial boost recommended for unfavourable topography




