20
Third Avenue Management shuttered its Third Avenue
Focused Credit fund in early December
2015
.
That fund was atypical in that it employed a high-risk
strategy focused on distressed debt, but the story
definitely spooked the market. Losses across the broad-
er high-yield bond Morningstar Category, however,
were not severe. The average fund in the category fell
2
.
4%
during December. That said, it was still a
rough year overall for the junk market, with the most
pain coming from energy and commodity-related
sectors, which have been hit hard by a slide in oil and
an economic slowdown in China. The average loss
for the category was
4
.
1%
for the year, while some
funds suffered much more.
How likely is it that other high-yield funds will
follow in Third Avenue Focused Credit’s footsteps?
Not likely. Most high-yield funds have far less risky
portfolios thanThird Avenue Focused Credit. That fund’s
large cadre of distressed names made it one of the
riskiest high-yield funds around. The portfolio held a
big allocation to the lowest-quality tiers of the junk
market and a sizable stake in issues without ratings,
and it was concentrated. As of July
2015
, close to
half of the fund was in bonds rated below B and
another
40%
in nonrated fare. By contrast, the median
allocation to below-B rated debt in the high-yield cate-
gory is just
12%
, and most funds hold little non-
rated debt. (Firms often classify equities as nonrated,
explaining the large nonrated stake reported by
funds such as Silver-rated
Fidelity Capital & Income
FAGIX
.) The Third Avenue fund was also unusually
concentrated, with a
5%
position in its largest name,
the troubled
Clear Channel Communications
(now
iHeartMedia
IHRT
), and only around
60
positions over-
all. Most high-yield funds are more diversified and
focus on less risky credits.
What are the signs of outsized credit or
liquidity risk?
There are several telltale signs, such as large stakes
in the lowest-quality bonds, especially if they’re concen-
trated in individual names or sectors. Nonrated
bonds make up only a tiny part of the market, while
bonds rated
CCC
or below account for
13%
of the
Bank of America Merrill
US
High Yield Master
II
Index.
Those issues can be difficult to sell in stressed mar-
kets and are more susceptible to permanent capital
losses. Another sign of risk is a yield that well
exceeds market norms, as it can denote outsized credit
or liquidity risk. Finally, shareholder concentration
or volatile flows can leave a fund vulnerable to a large
redemption request at a highly inopportune time,
raising the risk that a manager will have to sell quickly,
driving down prices in the process.
What should a high-yield investor do?
It is important to take a long-term perspective when
investing in junk bonds. Given the sector’s higher
correlation to stocks, investors should view high-yield
bonds as long-term tools for income generation
but not as safe-haven assets. For those uncomfortable
with the sector’s risk profile, it is probably best to
steer clear. Morningstar’s Christine Benz points out
that many institutional asset-allocation experts
skip high-yield bonds altogether and argue they don’t
add anything to a portfolio that one can’t get from
standard stock and bond allocations.
For those who do invest in high yield, what are the
key considerations?
Look for well-resourced managers with proven track
records who don’t reach for yield. When Morningstar
analysts evaluate high-yield funds, we favor
managers who have demonstrated bond-picking skills
through a variety of different market environ-
ments. Because success in high yield is driven in large
part by security selection and avoiding permanent
capital losses following defaults, the size and experi-
ence of a firm’s analyst staff is also important.
K
Contact Sarah Bush at
sarah.bush@morningstar.comHigh Yield Faces Challenges but Isn’t in
Third Avenue’s Shoes
Income Strategist
|
Sarah Bush




