Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  243 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 243 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

We have overhauled our allocation Morningstar Cate-

gories. Our three former categories—conservative

allocation, moderate allocation, and aggressive alloca-

tion—have been spliced into five new categories.

The new categories are Allocation–

15%

to

30%

Equity,

Allocation–

30%

to

50%

Equity, Allocation–

50%

to

70%

Equity, Allocation–

70%

to

85%

Equity, and Alloca-

tion–

85%

+ Equity.

The move reflects the growth in allocation funds and,

in particular, funds of funds. A fund of funds with

85%

equity can behave rather differently than a large-

blend fund with

85%

equity plus some bonds and

cash, because the fund of funds may have multiple

equity strategies including foreign equity, thus

covering a much wider swath of the market.

We opted for names that used the percentage of

equity rather than words like “moderate” or “conser-

vative” because equity risk is only one form of risk.

Quite a few income-oriented funds in the old conser-

vative-allocation group took on a lot of credit risk in

order to boost their yield. So they may be conservative

with regard to equity risk, but their overall profile

may be fairly risky.

We also wanted to carve up the categories into

more-narrow bands because that will make the ratings

and relative performance rankings more meaningful.

Ideally, they reflect skill rather than a set bias toward

one end of the allocation spectrum.

Understanding Risk

Let’s take this new lens to look at the domestic allo-

cation funds in the Morningstar

500

. I’ve produced a big

table to help you understand the funds. We show

each fund’s Morningstar Analyst Rating, new category,

10

-year downside capture ratio,

10

-year maximum

drawdown, equity weighting, foreign stock weighting,

bond weighting, and foreign bond weighting.

The downside capture ratio tells you how much of

the downside of the Morningstar Moderate Target Risk

Index the fund captured. The benchmark has

60%

in

global equities and

40%

in global bonds. So, if a fund

has

100%

downside capture versus that benchmark,

it means that in down periods it lost about the same, on

average, as the

60

/

40

benchmark. If it is

50%

, then

it lost about half as much as the

60

/

40

benchmark lost.

Maximum drawdown tells you the most the fund lost

from peak to trough in any period in the trailing

10

years.

Picks of the Crop

Allocation—

15%

to

30%

Equity

Vanguard LifeStrategy Income

VASIX

, with a

Morningstar Analyst Rating of Gold, is simple and cheap.

The fund owns four index funds and has just

20%

of

assets in equity. It divvies up equity exposure among

domestic and foreign index funds and does the same

with the bond side. It charges nothing on top of the

0

.

12%

in fees you’ll pay for the underlying indexes. Its

maximum drawdown is the third smallest in the group.

Allocation—30% to 50% Equity

Vanguard Wellesley Income

VWINX

is a brilliant

way to maintain market exposure without too much

risk. The fund holds about

35%

in dividend-paying

stocks and

65%

in a high-quality bond portfolio that is

dominated by corporate bonds rated A or higher.

Breaking Down Our New

Allocation Categories

Fund Reports

4

Artisan International Value Investor

BBH Core Select

Neuberger Berman Socially Rspns

Vanguard Wellington

Morningstar Research

8

Our New Sustainability Ratings

The Contrarian

10

The Trouble With Active Share

Red Flags

11

Funds Vulnerable to a

Growth Meltdown

Market Overview

12

Leaders & Laggards

13

Manager Changes and News

14

Portfolio Matters

16

7 Questions About Risk in

Your Retirement Portfolio

Tracking Morningstar

18

Analyst Ratings

Income Strategist

20

Muni Funds Stuck With

Puerto Rico Bonds

Changes to the 500

22

FundInvestor 500 Spotlight

23

Follow Russ on Twitter

@RussKinnel

RusselKinnel, Director of

ManagerResearch and Editor

FundInvestor

June 2016

Vol. 24 No. 10

Research and recommendatio s for the s riou fund investo

SM

Continued on Page 2