Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  567 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 567 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

March 2016

5

FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE, PLEASE CALL

800-211-7641

I don’t believe there is much news

that isn’t already built into the prices

of most high-yield bonds at this point.

Oil has already come close to touch-

ing $25 per barrel. Frackers and their

ilk have already shut down wells and

begun the process of trying to work out

their debt loads. Unless there is another

huge downtick in the price of oil, which

I can’t really see happening, most of the

bad news is, as I said, already built into

junk bond prices.

This bad news is reflected in the

yield you are being paid—High-

Yield Corporate’s 6.56% SEC yield is

5.42%, or 542 basis points, more than

Intermediate-Term Treasury

’s 1.14%

yield. The black line in the graph to

the right shows this difference in yield

(or spread) over the past 22 years. As

you can see, spreads have only been

this wide on three other occasions in

the past two decades: 2002, 2008–09,

and 2011 (when I first purchased the

fund in the

Model Portfolios

). It is

When High Yield’s Spread Is

High, Excess Returns Follow

Spread over Int-T. Treas.

Excess 12-mo. return

1/94

1/96

1/98

1/00

1/02

1/04

1/06

1/08

1/10

1/12

1/14

1/16

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

certainly possible that spreads could

widen further (it happened in the credit

crisis), but when spreads have reached

this level in the past, you’ve wanted to

be buying high-yield bonds, not sell-

ing. The blue line on the chart shows

the difference in performance between

High-Yield Corporate and Intermediate-

Term Treasury over the ensuing year.

On average, High-Yield Corporate out-

performed Intermediate-Term Treasury

by 9.2% in the 12 months after spreads

were over 500 bps.

There may be some more short-term

pain to come, but if you’d bought High-

Yield Corporate at these levels in the

past, you probably felt pretty darned

smart about it if you held on. I’m stick-

ing with High-Yield Corporate for the

moment, and suggest you do, too.

n

IT’S THE TALK

of the financial cable

news shows and various publications

and blogs, but the current accepted

wisdom is simply wrong.

Stock prices and oil prices are not

highly correlated, and to make a big

deal over a few weeks of trading is non-

sense. While we’ve seen a bit higher

correlation between the two recently,

over virtually any period of time longer

than it takes for a stock trader to spew

such silliness, stock markets and oil

prices have shown an average correla-

tion of around 7% to 10%. That’s a far

cry from 100%. Take a look:

First, here’s what’s happened over

the past few months, on a daily basis.

The left-most graph below shows each

day as either 100 (both stocks and oil

move in the same direction for the day)

or -100 (stocks and oil move in differ-

ent directions).

Since the end of June 2015, stock

prices and oil prices have moved in the

same direction on 112 days, or 65% of the

time. That’s a pretty high correlation, but

nowhere near 100%. The number rises a

bit in the first two months of 2016, when

over 40 trading days, stocks and oil moved

in the same direction 75% of the time.

But let’s take the calculation out

just a little bit further to determine the

strength of this supposition that stock

and oil prices move together. I looked

at rolling five-day periods just since the

end of 2015, and the average correla-

tion drops to 45%! But take the data out

a bit further, say more than 25 years,

and the average correlation over five-

day periods drops to an 8% average!

The same thing happens when you

look at longer periods of, say, correla-

tion over 100 days or 250 days or even

20 days. Correlation, on average, drops

to a meaningless level—about 7%.

CORRELATION

Oil and Stocks in Sync—Not!

Daily Oil-Stock Co-Movement

(S&P 500, Brent)

6/15

7/15

8/15

9/15

10/15

11/15

12/15

1/16

2/16

-100

0

100

>

Rolling 100-Day Correlation

(S&P 500, Brent)

2/89

2/92

2/95

2/98

2/01

2/04

2/07

2/10

2/13

2/16

100-day

Avg.

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Rolling 250-Day Correlation

(S&P 500, Brent)

2/90

2/92

2/94

2/96

2/98

2/00

2/02

2/04

2/06

2/08

2/10

2/12

2/14

2/16

250-day

Avg.

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%