Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  645 / 708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 645 / 708 Next Page
Page Background

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

August 2016

3

FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE, PLEASE CALL

800-211-7641

Daniel P. Wiener - Senior Editor

Jeffrey D. DeMaso - Editor/Research Director

Seth H. Kennedy - Assistant Editor

Amy Long - Vice President and Publisher

Billy Currano - Senior Managing Editor

David Clarfield - Managing Editor

Rachel Johnsen - Editorial Assistant

Louisa Dorado - Marketing Director

Mary Southard - Marketing Director

John Hall Design Group - Design and Production

Fund Family Shareholder Association

Member, Newsletter Publishers Association

Daniel P. Wiener - Chairman

James H. Lowell - President

(www.FidelityInvestor.com)

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

(ISSN 1093-4200) is published monthly for members of the Fund Family Shareholder Association

by InvestorPlace Media, LLC, 9201 Corporate Blvd., Suite 200 Rockville MD 20850. A one-year membership is $229 (foreign, add $18).

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

/Fund Family Shareholder Association, c/o InvestorPlace

Media, LLC, 9201 Corporate Blvd., Suite 200 Rockville MD 20850.

The FFSA is an independent organization dedicated to providing investors with intelligent and objective advice about the Vanguard family of mutual

funds and services. If you have questions regarding your membership, call 800/211-7641

(service@adviseronline.com

). While the information provided

is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed, nor can the publication be considered liable for

the future investment performance of any securities or strategies discussed. The newsletter, hotline and associated publications provide information

of general interest and are not intended to provide individualized investment advice for any subscriber or specific portfolio. Subscribers are urged to

review the full disclaimer and securities holdings disclosure policy associated with this publication at

www.adviseronline.com/disclosure-disclaimer.

html or call

800-219-8592

to receive a copy via mail. Vanguard and The Vanguard Group are service marks of The Vanguard Group, Inc. FFSA and

InvestorPlace Media, LLC are not affiliated in any way with The Vanguard Group and receive no compensation from The Vanguard Group, Inc.

Copyright 2016 by Fund Family Shareholder Association. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited except by written permission of FFSA.

And it wasn’t just stock indexes

hitting new records; the yield on the

10-year Treasury bond hit a 240-year

low of 1.321% in July, putting prices

sky-high (remember, when yields go

down, bond prices go up).

As I’ve said time and again, when

markets (and portfolios) hit highs, there

are really only two future outcomes—

you either go on to another all-time

high, or you drop below it. Don’t let

a short-term decline, which we could

easily see in the coming months, fill

you with regret that you somehow

didn’t sell at the top and lock in those

highs. That’s a foolish way to invest,

since it’s simply an attempt at short-

term market-timing that just won’t

work. Over the more than 25 years that

I’ve been writing to you, we’ve had

countless opportunities to sell “at the

top.” But had we done so, where would

we be now? Personally, my holdings in

funds like Dividend Growth and sev-

eral of the PRIMECAP-run funds like

Capital Opportunity

have never been

larger. I love compounding even small

gains on top of ever-larger amounts of

money.

If you want another example of the

futility of trying to time the market,

consider the last trading day of July. The

morning’s initial report (there’ll be two

revisions in the weeks ahead) on second-

quarter GDP indicated the U.S. econ-

omy grew at a 1.2% annualized pace,

which was well short of expectations.

How do you think traders responded to

this disappointing read on our economy?

Well, after initial selling, buyers stepped

in, and the S&P 500 index finished the

day with gains. Go figure.

Looking ahead, with the conventions

behind us, the real heat in the presiden-

tial contest will begin as Donald Trump

and Hillary Clinton slug it out on the

campaign trail. This will be a very

hard-fought contest, and while history

says that the outcome should have little

impact on investment markets long-

term, the uncertainty around escalating

rhetoric could cause volatility, which

has come down lately, to spike again.

Stay tuned—but also, stay calm.

Taking Money to the Bank

Closer to home and our pocket-

books, those fee waivers Vanguard has

been applying to its tax-exempt money

market funds have been cut way back.

Based on the recent crop of semiannual

reports, expenses for five tax-exempt

money funds have risen anywhere from

50% to 83%. Yes, I know the expenses

remain low, but on a percentage basis

(the way Vanguard likes to present

changes), the differences are huge. I

still don’t understand why, if Vanguard

could run the funds for as little as

0.05% to 0.08%, they couldn’t keep

doing so. They clearly had enough

other cash flow to make up for the

waivers, and still do.

I’m pretty sure Vanguard continues

to shave costs in the technology area. It

appears their computers are still mak-

ing hash of many people’s consolidated

brokerage and fund accounts. Besides

the complications arising from holding

two money market funds, like bounced

checks, apparently Vanguard isn’t

reporting correct prices on reinvested

distributions. And so far, according to

those of you who’ve written me, they

have no explanation for the problems.

Many of you have said you’re tired

of the snafus and the lousy customer

service and are moving your money

to Fidelity. I won’t try to dissuade

you. I have accounts at Fidelity, and

their technology is lightyears ahead

of Vanguard’s. It’s said that you get

what you pay for, but it’s also true that

you don’t get what you don’t pay for.

Vanguard isn’t the “low-cost provider”

for nothing.

And on a final note,

The

New York

Times

reported that several senior busi-

ness leaders, including Vanguard chair-

man Bill McNabb, have been meeting

to try and put together what would

essentially be a set of governance rules

(recommendations, really) for pub-

lic companies that include things like

executive compensation and earnings

guidance. But one issue stuck out to

me: The group apparently thinks that

companies should compensate board

members in stock, not cash, something

I’ve said Vanguard should be doing with

its own fund board for years, and which

I repeated recently in last month’s issue.

It’s called eating your own cooking,

and the fact that McNabb is part of a

group recommending it to companies,

but isn’t doing so at his own company,

Vanguard, is just disingenuous. I own

more Vanguard funds than McNabb

does, and you’ll never be able to accuse

me of “Do as I say, not as I do.” I defi-

nitely eat my own cooking.

n

DIVIDEND

FROM PAGE 1

>

Money Market

Expense Ratios

Prior Current Change %-age

California 0.06% 0.10% 4 bps 67%

New Jersey 0.08% 0.12% 4 bps 50%

New York

0.06% 0.11% 5 bps 83%

Ohio

0.08% 0.12% 4 bps 50%

Pennsylvania 0.05% 0.09% 4 bps 80%