![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0015.png)
By Jade Gingerich
Rethinking Employment for Individuals with Disabilities
June 2016
Policy&Practice
13
E
mployment First is a national
framework for systems change
being implemented at the
state level. This framework is
centered on the premise that all people,
including individuals with significant
disabilities, are capable of full par-
ticipation in community integrated
employment regardless of their need
for accommodation. Through this
approach, state agencies are supported
as they work across systems to align
policies, practices, service delivery, and
reimbursement structures that support
community-integrated employment
as the first option for all working-age
adults. As many states embarked on
this realignment, it became increas-
ingly clear that Employment First
would have broader policy implications
than was initially understood.
Employment First is a critical policy
shift for all agencies serving youth
and working-age adults, particularly
those in poverty. Paid work should be
an expectation of the system, regard-
less of barriers. To achieve this end,
all stakeholder agencies must be
dedicated to creating a culture of work
alongside families, schools, and front-
line staff. Too often, agencies focus on
moving individuals with disabilities
off their caseloads onto public benefits.
This is viewed as helping, since it guar-
antees receipt of a monthly income;
however, that steady income equates
to a lifetime of poverty and serves to
reinforce long-held and outdated views
that individuals with disabilities are
not able to work. Not only can individ-
uals with disabilities work, there are a
number of work incentives designed to
encourage them to be employed and to
increase their earnings through work.
All human service and workforce
development agencies must be fully
equipped to support individuals with
disabilities and reinforce employment
as a desired and attainable outcome. In
some states, the waiting list for disability
specific services, such as Vocational
Rehabilitation Services, results in
individuals with disabilities not being
eligible for specialized services. This is
often especially true for those with the
least significant disabilities, Moreover,
many individuals, particularly those
with non-obvious disabilities, are not
likely to identify as having a disability
or be eligible on the basis of disability
in the adult service world, in spite of
having an Individualized Education
Plan (IEP) in school. Many youths
receiving Supplemental Security Income
(SSI) lose their benefits at age 18 per
the Social Security Administration’s
(SSA) redetermination process. As
a result, many of these youth, after
exiting school, are likely to find their
way to non-disability specific services,
including local social service offices and
America’s Job Centers.
The Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) is intended to
improve coordination of employment
services, workforce development, adult
education, and vocational rehabilita-
tion activities and for those states who
choose to, the Temporary Assistance
for Needy Families program (TANF).
The act also significantly increases
the emphasis on individuals with dis-
abilities, particularly out-of-school
youth, many of whom are likely to
have non-obvious disabilities. WIOA
also highlights the increasingly
complex nature of individual barriers
to employment, by listing 13 distinct
groups, each of which most certainly
includes individuals with disabilities.
The list includes, but is not limited
to, ex-offenders, the long-term unem-
ployed, homeless individuals, older
adults, individuals with disabilities,
low-income individuals, and youth who
are in or have aged out of foster care.
In addition, youth with disabilities are
to receive pre-employment readiness
services while in school. Schools are
required to track youth with IEPs one
year post-high school under Indicator
14, to capture the number who are
enrolled in higher education, engaged
in competitive employment (meaning
integrated work at or above minimum
wage), enrolled in some other post-
secondary education or training, or
engaged in some other employment.
Research indicates the greatest
predictor of post-school outcomes for
youth with disabilities is paid work