Previous Page  148 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 148 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

culties which we encounter in our work. A client is

naturally concerned about the progress of his case, he

does not know of the delays inherent in the present

staffing of the Land Registry and in other public offices,

the back log in some of our Courts and the other areas

in which delays can occur and hence of course the

solicitor becomes the target for the understandable

irritation and frustration felt by clients.

Forewarning

clients of probable delays would forestall some of

the irritations and frustrations which ultimately

lead to many of the complaints which we receive.

Brief progress Teports, where there will be delay, will

assist by keeping the client informed as to the problem

area. The Society as I have said, is fully conscious of

the public need, and processes all legitimate complaints

from the public through its Registrars and Disciplinary

Committees. Complaints are investigated by our staff

which has been augmented in recent months to speed

the resolution of these problems in the public interest.

The reputation of our profession is high and it must

be safeguarded. Hence, the few members of our

profession whose conduct brings that reputation into

question in the slightest degree, must accept the con-

sequences, in fairness to all. Protection and service for

the public is our vital role. It goes without saying, that

it is the duty of every solicitor and of our Society, to

ensure that protection and service is given and also

clearly seen to be given.

From time to time there is much

comment

in relation to solicitors' fees and earnings. Quite

an amount of the comment appears to be based

on a lack of understanding of the functions and

services provided by a solicitor and of the cost of pro-

viding that service. It is absolutely true to say that

there has been no real or worthwhile increase in

the earnings of the members of our profession

during the past ten years.

This in turn has created

part of our existing problem, in that there are some

members of our profession at present who for financial

considerations, are unable to engage the expert assis-

tance which is essential at this time in providing for

the public an adequate and acceptable service. Many of

the law clerks and legal assistants who were available

to practitioneers, have over the years gone into the

public service, by reason of the fact that our profession

financially was unable to compete with the terms offered

to non-qualified legal personnel. Many of our members

work hours in excess of, and some far in excess of, a

forty hour week. All one need do in general is to com-

pare even the witnesses' expenses demand by and paid

to-ordinary and expert witnesses who attend Court, to

the fee paid to a solicitor for attending in the same

Court. An increase of 6 6 $% in the fees payable in re-

lation to the Criminal Legal Aid Scheme was granted

earlier this year and will soon be in force. This increase

which is still inadequate, shows how far these fees had

lagged behind in reasonableness over the years. One

need only compare the fees charged by businesses

which are involved in the provision of an adequate

office administration and structure similar to what is

required in our profession with our fees, to see how

wide the gap is and how low our fees and remunerat-

ion the by comparison.

The Council has recently applied to the Court Com-

mittees for increases in costs. A questionnaire has been

sent to all members, but the response is unsatisfactory.

A far better response should be made. I must emphasise

that all information disclosed is confidential. Wi t h-

out this information, there is no prospect of getting the

Prices Commission to consider our application properly.

Amendments to Bye Laws

Mr. Peter Prentice, in proposing the amendments of

various Bye-Laws of the Society, pointed out that these

amendments were proposed for the assistance of mem-

bers and the efficient running of the Council of the

Society.

1. Amendment No. 1 was then read as follows:—

That Bye-law 13 be an and it is amended as

follows:—

That the words "twenty-one" be substituted for the

word "fourteen" on the fifth line thereof, and that the

word "fourteen" be substituted for the words "one

week" on the 7th line thereof and for the word "three"

on the 9th line thereof.

The effect of the amendment is that Twenty One

days notice, instead of Fourteen as formerly, is hence-

forth necessary, in order to deal with any special busin-

ess connected with the Society. This Notice must be

posted in the Society's premises at least fourteen days

beforehand, instead of seven days as previously. Notice

of such Special Business is to be sent to the Director

General at least 14 days, instead of 3 days» as formerly,

before it is discussed.

2. Amendment 2 introduces a new Bye-Law as

follows:—

"24a. No resolution shall be binding on the Society

until it has been adopted by the Council, or has been

confirmed at the next General Meeting, and it shall

be the duty- of the Council, if they do not adopt the

resolution, to bring the same before the next General

Meeting accordingly. Provided that this Bye-law shall

not apply in the case of: —

(a) the repeal or alteration of a Bye-law; or

(b) the enactment of a new bye-law; or

(c) a resolution proposed by the Council and carried

at the meeting at which it shall have been proposed; or

(d) a resolution confirming, rescinding or varying

the period of suspension of a member from member-

ship of the Society; or

(e) a resolution passed in pursuance of Rule 48, < r

Rule 49; or

146