Previous Page  291 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 291 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

Report of President's Visit to

New Zealand

When the New Zealand Law Society invitation was

received last November to attend the 16th Triennial

Conference in Wellington from 3rd to the 8th April,

this seemed

a

long

way

off. I

wondered,

when it was suggested that the invite tion should be

accepted, whether a trip to New Zealand, would in

any way be of benefit to the Society. I must confess

that the measure of my interest and enthusiasm for

the suggested journey was so great that it outweighed

any reservations which I had as to the benefit which

would be gained. My acceptance in the end was more

than justified. In fact I find it difficult to curb my

enthusiasm.

Before arriving in Wellington I was uncertain as to

what exactly lay before me. On arrival I found within

a very short space of time that my wife and I had the

very good fortune to meet people who had a

natural ability to extend a very sincere and warm

welcome, and we evidenced a friendliness and a con-

cern for our welfare which went far beyond our great-

est expectations. The Conference Chairman was Mr.

M. O'Brien, Q.C., his Assistants, Mr. John McGrath

and Mr. Michael Shanahan. One might assume that

they were by reason of bearing such surnames the

purveyors of the traditional form of Irish hospitality.

It fact it was something more oxtensive than that and

was in no way confined to those of Irish ancestry. While

many New Zealand Lawyers are of Irish decent, there

are equally as many with English, Scottish and Welsh

ancestry and all displayed a similar sincere and ex-

cellent form of hospitality; it was evident everywhere

in all the people we met, and in all the areas we visit-

ed from Mr.Lester Castie, President of the New Lea-

land law Society and his wife, through the whole

range of Secretaries and Staff of the

New

Zealand and District Law Societies. I met Lawyers

who attended The International Bar Conference in

Dublin in 1968 and they were very anxious and in-

deed determined to repay in kind the Irish hospitality

extended at that time.

The open and friendly approach and the interest

displayed in Ireland and in our Society presented a

continuous flow of questions which led to two news-

paper interviews, many luncheons and dinners and

private functions apart from the official functions of

Conference. We were hosted, wined and dined by the

the

Auckland,

Christchurch,

and

Canterbury

Societies and on our homeward journey by the Victoria

Law Society (Australia). Our Hotel Expenses in New

Zealand were paid for by the New Zealand Law

Society.

Conference

The papers a't the actual Conference and the sub-

sequent discussions dealt with the following matters: —

(1) Private right v Public interest by C. I. Patterson,

of the Legislation Committee of the New Zea-

land Law Society.

(2) The legal problems of Inflation by I. L. McKay,

of the Law Revision Committee of New Zealand.

(3) Dangerous Products and the Consumer in New

Zealand by Geoffrey W. R. Palmer, a Consul-

tant 'to the Australian Government and to the

Zealand Accident Compensation Committee.

(4) Court Structure and Procedure by A. D. Holland.

Council member of 'the New Zealand Law Society

and a past lecturer in Commercial Law in the

University of Canterbury.

(5) The Land Transfer System by F. M. Brookfield,

Editor of Goodall & Brookfield on Conveyancing.

(6) The Right to Life by The Hon. Mr. Justice

Beattie.

(7) Administrative Law — The vanishing Sphinx by

the Hon. Mr. Justice Cooke who is a member of

the Law Reform Committee, and Chairman of the

Commission of Enquiry into Housing.

All of the papers which were read and discussed

were of immense in'terest. My intention is to present

the papers to the library and it is hoped that edited

editions of some of the papers may be worthy of re-

porting in the Gazette in due course.

Apart from the official papers read at the Confer-

ence, I was invited 'to, and sat in on, a closed meeting

of the New Zealand Law Society, which lasted four

hours. It was a most interesting experience. The

most notable general feature was that the various

problems and matters which came up for discussion

were very largely in line with matters which would

come up for discussion at any meeting of the pro-

fession in 'this country. Among the topics discussed

were the following: —

Taxation legislation and the inroads into the quest-

ion of privilege;

Need to publicly criticise certain legislation where

appropriate;

Consideration of funding a Negligence Insurance

Scheme;

A need for more and more practical Seminars;

Public relations and the general image of the pro-

fession;

Publicity material;

The progress of a training course for Legal Exec-

tives;

The suggested remoteness of the Council of the New

Zealand Law Society from some of the practical

problems of members in remote areas.

The New Zealand Legal System

In general it was a valuable exercise in ascertaining

the mind of the profession and in having new ideas

discussed and talked about.

The New Zealand legal system is based on thé Com-

.284