Law Students Debat ng
Inaugural
((19 February, 1975)
P l
Cocney, T.D., Minister for Justice, in the
'se of proposing a vote of thanks to Mr. Paul
nratty, the Auditor of the Kings Inns Students
Dating Society, for his paper on legal education
gratulatcd him on picking this subject of funda-
p j
1
.
importance to the future of the legal pro-
it
l
s , o n a n d
avoiding the temptation to be with
Su
,
y
delivering a paper on some of the in subjects
a
as family law or so-called repressive law. The
^mister continued.
0u
Tj
,e lc
8al profession is in a privileged position in
r
Society in that it has a monopoly of financially
a n d
r a l , v c
business. If that monopoly is to be justified
a
continued the profession must give to the public
Qf
e a
' jy professional service. It is my belief a service
ent
s t a n d a r d
c a n n
° t be provided unless new
tr
.
r a n t s l o
the profession are fully and adequately
ined to carry out their jobs. This has not L n the
f°sition up to now."
^ be Minister reviewed the submissions made to his
fi
p a r
*
m e n
t on the subject of legal education. The
con '
t h C S e W 3 S 3 S f a r b a c k a s 1 9 6 1
'
T h e r e h a s b e e n
^nsistent pressure from the Incorporated Law
tice
C t y f 0 r r c f o r m i n t h e
education of their appren-
.
s
- The Minister said he was glad to have been
a
e
to co-operate with the Society in bringing about
* * educational regime for intending Solicitors
^ m e n c i n g next academic year. He thanked the
a n d
e t
y
their attitude to this important subject
stud
S U r e t b a t t b e n e w r e
S '
m e
involving academic
inst
l 6 a d i n g t 0 a
degree followed by a period of
ruction by the Society in the practical and com-
H'oT^
a
PP
, i c a t i o n
°f
academic legal knowledge
serv-
W e l1 fit o u r n e w S o l i c i t o r s
to offer a prope.-
car
,
Ce
t h e
P
u b l i c
f r o m t b e
very start of their
eers. "The efficiency of a new Solicitor up to now
and
Cllded o n b o w t b o r o u
8
b a n
apprenticeship he had
n
l n m y e x
P
e r i e n c e
many apprenticeships were in
» *
o n l
y . I have indicated to the Society and they
^
e
Pt my point of view that no student having taken
f
avv
degree should be deprived entry to the pro-
c h
s ,
° n lor want of a master and that the practice of
a
rging premiums to apprentices should be dis-
c
°ntinued."
t h ^ if Minister continued by saying that he hoped
e x
e
Benchers of Kings Inn would shortly follow the
j
n
m
Ple of the Incorporated Law Society by introduc-
a
g a
course of studies which would involve both the
the
a n d t b e
P
r a c t i c a l
subjects. He stated that
^ Present practice whereby a qulified barrister had
W a s
e a r n
bis trade by devilling to an established man
less'
a n
a m a t e u r
'
s b
approach where a hard pro-
sionalism was required.
bra i f
m n o t
i n
l
a v o u r
° l
t b e
lusion of the two
j
ts
n c h e s
of the Society but each will have to justify
f
e
.
S e p a r
a te existence by a high standard of pro-
c om°
n a l
Performance. The Solicitors branch has
m
cnced reforms to ensure just this. If the other
branch fails to follow suit, I would fear such pressure
for fusion between the branches that even I, an
opponent of fusion, would find it hard to resist."
The Minister continued to say that he would like
to see as soon as possible a system whereby law
students .would commence their studies by taking a
• degree and at that stage they would opt to become
barristers or solicitors and enter on the practical
course of study provided by the professional body of
their choice. At the moment a teenager leaving school
has to decide at that relatively immature stage which
particular branch of the profession he will join and
the Minister remarked that he thought a more mature
choice could be made at the degree stage.
Mr. Justice Kenny suggested that the whole system
of legal education should be confined to the uni-
versities, instead of being split between
the
Universities, the King's Inns and the Incorporated Law
Society. Seven of the nine E.E.C. countries trained
their law students totally within universities, and the
break in the law student's training in Ireland was
indefensible.
Mr. Patrick Hanratty echoed the point on frag-
mentation. A professional student who wished to
take an academic degree found that he had to take
separate examinations in the same subject in separate
institr'ions, usually in separate years.
This arose through a lack of liaison and co-
operation between the various institutions. No real
progress could be made in solving the basic problems
of legal education until this primary problem had
been overcome, he added.
Mr. Hanratty said that the emphasis was on
lecturing, almost to the exclusion of other forms of
instruction. Dialogue between teacher and student
was impossible in overcrowded classrooms. Practical
exercises in the application of the rules learned at
lectures were almost non-existent and, in many cases,
visits to the courts were not even encouraged.
"In this respect not alone is law studied without
adequate reference to its social context, but also
without adequate reference to its practical legal
context. The student's concept of justice and appreci-
ation of the way the law works is lost in a tangled
mass of equitable easements, memoranda and, if he
can't stand the pace, tranquilisers."
Because a long-term solution could not be found
without greater liaison between the various institu-
tions, Mr. Hanratty suggested the establishment of a
Council for Legal Education.
The council would consist of representatives from
the Benchers of the King's Inns, the Council of the Law
Society, the Law Departments of the Universities and
the legal professions.
Apart from eliminating fragmentation in the
education system, the Council of Legal Education
could deal in a rational
and unified manner with the
problems affecting
all
branches
of t h e legal e d u c a t i o n.
57




