Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  331 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 331 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S316

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose or Objective

Danish national guidelines (GL) for head and neck cancer

radiotherapy (RT) have been available since 1990 and

were revised in 2013. One of the major revision points was

the change of GTV to CTV margins from mainly

anatomically driven expansions to symmetric geometric

expansion. The purpose of this study was to analyse the

consistency of generated CTV contours by the new

approach and to evaluate the impact on CTVs and any

differences between four centres involved in RT before

and after the guideline revision.

Material and Methods

Prior to the GL change in 2013, four centres were asked to

delineate CTV1, CTV2 and CTV3 of a stage IV oropharynx

patient with three prescription levels: 66 Gy, 60 Gy and 50

Gy in 33 fractions. The contours of the tumour GTV and

the lymph node GTV were provided together with the

organs at risk (OAR). Each centre made a RT plan from the

CTVs. After the new GL was implemented, the centres

were asked to repeat the CTV contouring and the dose

planning. Likewise, the centres were asked in 2016, three

years after the GL, to re-contour and re-plan to test the

consistency over time of the GL.

The difference in contouring was evaluated by the

difference in CTV volume, Dice Similarity Coefficient

(DSC) and average minimum surface distance (MSD)

between the CTV contours. The difference in dose plans

was evaluated by mean dose to OAR and dose-specific

treated volumes (V

62.7Gy

, V

57Gy

, V

47.5 Gy

and V

25Gy

)

.

The

statistical difference was tested with a paired two-sided

Student's t-test (p<0.05).

Results

The contours from GL 2004 were less uniform and showed

large volume differences (Table 1). The MSD showed a

mean difference of 0.6 cm and a relatively large standard

deviation (SD) of 0.45 cm for the CTV1. The GL 2013

provided a more operational margin expansion and hence

resulted in a high DSC and very similar volumes, however

with a mean increase of 40% and 32% for the CTV1 and

CTV2, respectively. The re-contouring in 2016 was similar

to 2013 indicating that the interpretation of GL 2013 is not

affected by time.

The similarity of the CTV targets in 2013-16 resulted in

more uniform dose plans, however, the different planning

approaches resulted in only slight difference to the OAR,

and the SD of mean doses did not improve significantly.

The SD of the irradiated volume improved with the GL

2013 and further improved in 2016 dose plans. It is obvious

that the larger CTVs of the GL 2013 increased the

irradiated volume (figure 1), however improved planning

and familiarity of the GL reduced this difference in the

2016 plans.

Conclusion

The GL 2013 showed more uniform CTV1 and CTV2

contouring between centres, which was reproduced in

2016. The more geometric GTV to CTV expansion allows

for an easier operational delineation which leaves less

room for misinterpretation. This transforms into more

uniform treatment plans and very similar irradiated

volumes across all centres.

PO-0614 The prognostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in

head and neck cancer and the importance of HPV status

J.M. Moan

1

, E. Malinen

2

, J.G. Svestad

3

, C.D. Amdal

1

, T.V.

Bogsrud

4

, E. Dale

1

1

Oslo University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Oslo,

Norway

2

University of Oslo, Department of Physics, Oslo, Norway

3

Oslo University Hospital, Department of Medical

Physics, Oslo, Norway

4

Oslo University Hospital, Department of Nuclear

Medicine, Oslo, Norway

Purpose or Objective

Standardized uptake value (SUV) and related parameters

derived from 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to radiochemotherapy

of head and neck cancer have been shown in several

studies to correlate with survival. We wanted to validate

this finding in our own patient cohort, but also to see the

PET parameters together with clinical risk factors

including HPV status.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 225 patient cases from 2007

to 2014 with complete sets of 18F-FDG PET/CT and

potential clinical risk factors (age, sex, ECOG status,

Charlson comorbidity status, pack years of smoking, TNM

stage, tumor differentiation, tumor site, HPV DNA status

(tested for oropharyngeal cancers [OPC]), treatment

duration, days on nimorazole and numbers of weekly

cisplatinum. All patients received radiotherapy with 68-70

Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Patients older than 70 years or with

comorbidity did not receive concomitant cisplatinum

(26%). Clinical endpoints were overall survival (OS), local

control, regional control, distant control, and disease-free

survival (DFS). We investigated the image parameters; 1)

Gross tumor volume (GTV) based on CT and PET, 2) PET

tumor volume delineated by the nuclear medicine

specialist, 3) metabolic tumor volume (MTV), 4) total