Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  374 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 374 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S359

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Modulated Arc-Therapy or Tomotherapy. Concomitant

chemotherapy (Cht) consisted in oral capecitabine at a

dose of 1250 mg/m

2

/day.

Results

From 11/2010 to 09/2016, 24 pts were treated.

Characteristics of pts: median age: 69 years (45-83), 12 M

and 12 F, median KPS: 90. Eighteen pts (75%) had Klatskin

disease, 6 pts (25%) had common and distal bile duct

disease (3: intra-pancreatic). Treatment: All pts

underwent surgery (19 pts R1, 5 pts R0: 3 pts were N+, 1

pt pT4 and 1 pt had hilary infiltration). Only 3 pts were

previously treated with neoadjuvant Cht (2 pts:

GEM+CDDP, 1 pt: capecitabine). Four pts received

adjuvant Cht (1 pts: PEXG, 1 pt: GEM, 1 pt: GEMOX, 1pt:

CDDP+GEM).

Seventeen pts (71%) received Cht

concomitant to RT. Ten pts (42%) underwent c-e CT and

CTPET simulation, 6 pts (25%) underwent 4D c-e CT and 8

pts (33%) only c-e CT. Eight pts (50%) were PET positive.

AcuteToxicity: all pts were evaluable. Most toxicities were

G1-G2: 2 pts (8%) experienced diarrhea, 14 (58%)

nausea/vomiting, 9 (37%) abdominal pain, 3 (12%)

cholangitis, 2 (8%) gastric ulcer. Only one pt developed

gastro-duodenitis G3. Late toxicity: 20/24 pts were

evaluable, no toxicity ≥ G2 occurred. Responses: 23/25 pts

were evaluable. Nine pts (39%) had PD (3 local and distant

progression, 5 only distant and 1 only local progression).

Median TTLP and OS, evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier

method, were calculated from start of RT and resulted

31.0, 34.5 months respectively.

Conclusion

Adjuvant Hypo-IGRT delivering 44.25 Gy in 15 fractions

concomitant to oral capecitabine in patients with extra-

hepatic cholangiocarcinoma is feasible with a good

toxicity profile.

PO-0695 Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and

resection for esophageal cancer: outcomes in daily

practice.

E.S.H. Portier

1

, K.J. Neelis

1

, M. Fiocco

2

, W.O. De Steur

3

,

A.M.J. Langers

4

, J.J. Boonstra

4

, H.H. Hartgrink

5

, M.

Slingerland

6

, F.P. Peters

1

1

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands

2

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of

Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden, The

Netherlands

3

Leiden University Medical Center, Deparment of

Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands

4

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of

Gastroenterology, Leiden, The Netherlands

5

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of

Surgery, Leiden, The Netherlands

6

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of

Medical Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Since the first results of the Dutch randomized CROSS trial

(van Hagen et al, 2012), neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

(CRT) followed by resection for primary resectable non-

metastastic esophageal cancer (EC) was implemented as

standard curative treatment in the Netherlands. We

evaluated clinical outcomes with this treatment in daily

practice.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients treated

for primary resectable non-metastatic EC between May

2010 and December 2015 at our institution. Patients were

included if they started treatment with the intention to

undergo neo-adjuvant CRT followed by resection. Patients

with neuro-endocrine histology and treatment for

recurrent EC were excluded. Treatment consisted of

external beam radiotherapy (23 fractions of 1,8 Gy), 5

weekly courses of carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (50

mg/m2) and transthoracic or transhiatal resection. We

recorded patient and tumour characteristics, survival,

disease progression, acute and late toxicity/complications

(CTCAE version 4, Clavien-Dindo classification) and send

quality of life (QOL) questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and

QLQ-OES18, EQ-5D-5L and a self-developed questionnaire

on dumping complaints) to surviving patients.

Results

One hundred forty-five patients were included (table 1).

Median follow-up was 43 months (95% CI 32.6-53.4

months). All patients completed radiotherapy as intended

and 86.9% received the full chemotherapy regimen. One

hundred thirty-seven patients underwent surgery, with a

resection of the tumour in 130 patients (90%). One patient

had a microscopically irradical resection(<1%). Median

overall survival (OS) was 35 months (95% CI 29.8-40.2

months, fig. 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was

30 months (95% CI 19.7-40.3 months). Three-year OS and

PFS were 49.6% (95% CI 40.4-58.8%) and 45.6% (95% CI

36.6-54.6%) respectively. Three year cumulative incidence

for locoregional progression and distant metastasis were

31% (95% CI 22.9-39.1%) and 45.3% (95% CI 36.5-54.19%)

.

In univariate analysis, tube feeding before start of neo-

adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, dysphagia score (0-1 versus

2-4), length of the tumour, clinical T-stage, number of

chemotherapy cycles, pathological response (pT- and pN-

stage) and extracapsular extension of lymphnode

metastases were significantly associated with OS. Tube

feeding

and

extracapsular

extension

were

significant in multivariate analysis. Toxicity and QOL are

currently analysed, results will be available at

presentation.