Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S44

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Calculation of the prognostic score

ECOG PS 2-4

2 points

No systemic treatment

2 points

Pleural effusion and/or metastases

2 points

On intravenous antibiotics during last 2 weeks 1 point

ESAS appetite worse than median

1 point

ESAS pain while not moving worse than median 1 point

Conclusion

The presence of pain while not moving and reduced

appetite (below/above median) predicted significantly

shorter survival. The score identified 4 groups with clearly

different prognosis and should be examined in additional

independent cohorts. Future research should include

patient-reported symptoms because they were more

important than primary tumor type, age and other

baseline parameters.

PV-0088 Half body irradiation schedule in patients

with multiple bone metastases: a phase I-II trial

M. Ferro

1

, F. Deodato

1

, F. Dello Iacovo

1

, G. Macchia

1

, S.

Di Santo

1

, M. Nuzzo

1

, S. Cilla

2

, A. Farioli

3

, A. Zamagni

4

, L.

Ronchi

4

, A. Arcelli

4,5

, S. Mignona

6

, R. Frakulli

4

, E. Farina

4

,

S. Cammelli

4

, G.P. Frezza

5

, V. Valentini

7

, A .G. Morganti

4

1

Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”,

Radiotherapy Unit, Campobasso, Italy

2

Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”,

Medical Physics Unit, Campobasso, Italy

3

University of Bologna, Department of Medical and

Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Bologna, Italy

4

University of Bologna, Radiation Oncology Center-

Department of Experimental- Diagnostic and Specialty

Medicine - DIMES, Bologna, Italy

5

Ospedale Bellaria, Radiotherapy Department, Bologna,

Italy

6

Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura “Giovanni Paolo II”,

Oncology Unit, Campobasso, Italy

7

Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”- Università

Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Department of Radiotherapy,

Rome, Italy

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of an half-body irradiation (HBI)

schedule on pain relief in multiple bone metastases cancer

patients. The secondary aim was to evaluate the safety of

this short course hypofractionated treatment.

Material and Methods

From August 2003 to February 2016, patients with

widespread symptomatic bone metastases and no previous

history of large field radiotherapy were enrolled. The pain

score (pain evaluation obtained by multiplying severity ×

frequency) and the drug score (analgesic assumption

evaluation obtained by multiplying severity×frequency) as

well as the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used to

record and monitor pain. Data on pain status and

dosage/frequency of analgesic consumption were

recorded before treatment (baseline evaluation) and

during follow-up. HBI encompassed the lower half body

(pelvic bones, lumbo-sacral vertebrae and upper third of

femurs).

Prostate cancer metastases received 15 Gy/3Gy

fraction along 5 days. Skeletal metastases due to other

primary tumors received accelerated HBI (3 Gy fractions

twice daily, 6–8 h apart, on 2 consecutive days, up to 12

Gy).

Results

258 patients (M/F 102/156; median age: 64; range 29-95)

were enrolled and completed the treatment. After HBI, a

significant reduction of pain, as evaluated by VAS, was

recorded (pre- treatment versus post- treatment mean

VAS: 5.4 versus 2.7, CI 2.2-3.2; p=0.0001). Moreover, 62

patients (24%) had complete pain relief and 64 patients

(25%) showed more than a 30% VAS reduction. Overall

response rate for pain was 53% (CI 0.95: 46.2% - 60.4%). In

182 patients (71%) Pain and Drug scores before and after

treatment were valuable. Statistical analysis showed a

significant reduction of Pain and Drug scores especially

concerning patients with the highest scores before

treatment (Chi squared test: p=0.001). In particular, 26

patients (14%) achieved a Drug Score’s reduction and 40

patients (22%) discontinued analgesic therapy. Nineteen

percent of all series exhibited no treatment related

complications, and an additional 79% experienced only

mild or moderate (transitory) toxicity. As a whole, Grade

> 3 toxicity (severe) was seen in four patients (2%):

haematologic G3 (1 pt) and gastro-intestinal G3 (2 pts).

Only 1 Grade 4 haematologic toxicity was registered. 111

patients (43%) presented pain flare’s phenomenon.

Conclusion

HBI is safe and effective, providing long lasting pain

reduction in patients with multiple bone metastases.

PV-0089 Relation between pain control and bone

mineral density change in bone metastases

H. Kobayashi

1

, H. Takagi

1

, K. Tanaka

1

, T. Matsuyama

1

, K.

Yamazaki

1

, M. Matsuo

2

, T. Yanase

1

, M. Tanaka

1

1

Ogaki Municipal Hospital, department of radiotherapy,

Ogaki, Japan

2

Ogaki Municipal Hospital, department of nursing, Ogaki,

Japan

Purpose or Objective

External beam radiation therapy is an effective technique

for bone metastases. The main roles of radiotherapy are

relief of pain and stabilizing metastatic bones. In

achieving pain control in patients with bone metastases,

pain relief is usually obtained in 70% of patients by using

a variety of dose fraction schemes. However the role of

radiotherapy in stabilizing is unclear. The purpose of this

study is to investigate the relationship between the pain

control effects of radiotherapy and bone mineral density

change after the after the compression of radiotherapy

Material and Methods

Data from 102 patients who underwent radiation therapy

because of lytic bone metastases lesions from January

2015 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.

Forty patients (sixty-two lesions) received computed

tomography (CT) scans prior to initiation and at least

twice after radiation therapy. The most common primary

site was breast accounting for 14 (35%). Liver, lung,

esophagus and rectal tumors accounted for 11 (27.5%), 8

(20%), 3 (7.5%), and 2 (5%) patients, respectively. Percent

change in bone attenuation between pre-radiation

therapy and post-radiation therapy were computed for

irradiated metastatic bone (IMB) lesions and irradiated

non-metastatic bone (INMB). Pain intensity was self-

assessed by patients using a scale graduated from 0 to 10.

Patients were asked for the scale at least once a week

from the beginning of radiotherapy till 3 weeks after