Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  681 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 681 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S665

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

exclusive EBRT with Carboplatin-Taxol compared to

FOLFOX-4 regimen.

Material and Methods

Patients were matched 1:1 with respect to age at

diagnosis (±5 years), stage (I-II vs III-IV), biopsy proven

histology (squamous vs adeno) and topography (upper,

middle or lower third or cardia). 46 patients followed the

above criteria and remained for the final analysis : 23

patients were treated with FOLFOX-4 regimen (group A)

and 23 patients with Carboplatin AUC2 mg/mL per min and

Taxol 50mg/m

2

, weekly (group B). Comparison between

the 2 groups was performed using Mac Nemar test for

paired data. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS

9.3 software. All tests were two sided and

P

values were

considered significant when less than 0.05.

Results

The mean age in group A was 69.4 years (12.5) and 72.4

years (12.6) in group B (p=ns). In each group, 11 patients

had a stage III disease at diagnosis (47.8%) with only 2

stage IV in group A (8.7%) vs none in group B.

The median delivered RT doses were 50Gy [14-60] in group

A while it was 50Gy [20-70] in group B. We found no

difference in the compliance with chemotherapy in each

group : 6 courses were delivered in 12 patients in group A

(52.2%) and 14 patients in group B (60.9%) (p=0.51). No

difference in dose reduction was observed between each

group for each course of chemotherapy.

After chemoradiation, G1 or higher esophagitis was

observed in 5 patients (26.3%) in group A and 3 patients

(13.0%) in group B of whom 0 vs 2 G3 were observed in

group A and B, respectively. Four patients (21.1%) had a

pulmonary infection in group A and 3 in group B (13.0%).

Looking at haematological toxicity, 2 patients (8.7%) vs 4

patients (17.4%) had G3 neutropenia, with only 0 and 2

neutropenic fever in group A and B, respectively. No

patient had G-CSF. Neither G3 anemia, nor G3

thrombopenia occured.

After a median follow-up of 17.7 months [0.0-46.9], 25

patients had died, 14 in group A (60.9%) and 11 in group B

(47.8%).

The median PFS rates were 14 months in group A [7.7-NR]

vs 12.1 months [4.4-NR] in group B (p=0.32).

The median OS rates were 20.3 months in group A [6.2-

39.3] vs 17.0 months [4.8-NR] in group B (p=0.82).

Conclusion

Exclusive chemoradiation with Carboplatin and Taxol

seems feasible with similar toxicity and survival outcomes

than FOLFOX-4. The safety and efficacy of the CROSS

regimen needs to be tested prospectively with EBRT doses

>41.4Gy in a phase II or III trial.

EP-1248 Adjuvant radiotherapy for gastric cancer

patients underwent gastrectomy and D2 lymph node

dissection

Y. Wang

1

, J.M. Hwang

1

, Y.K. Chang

1

, W.Y. Kao

2

, H.L.

Wan

2

, S.Y. Chang

2

, C.C. Wu

3

1

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Radiation Oncology, New Taipei

City, Taiwan

2

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Medical Oncology, New Taipei

City, Taiwan

3

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, General Surgery, New Taipei

City, Taiwan

Purpose or Objective

The benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) has been

confirmed by the Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) study.

However, as D2 lymph node dissection has been linked to

lower recurrence rate, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy

(RT), whether with or without concurrent chemotherapy,

following D2 dissection is controversial. The goal of this

study is to review the clinical outcome of patients with

locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma underwent

gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection with or without

adjuvant RT.

Material and Methods

We reviewed 420 patients who were diagnosed with

gastric cancer at Taipei TzuChi Hospital during Jan, 2008

to Sep, 2015, while excluding the following patients: those

a) >80 years old, b) didn’t undergo gastrectomy and D2

dissection, c) with distant metastases at diagnosis, d)

stage IA or IB without nodal metastases, or e) patients who

had never been disease-free. The overall survival (OS) and

disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared between

patients treated with or without adjuvant RT. Chi-square

test or unpaired t-test were used to compare the age,

gender, positive lymph nodes (LN) numbers, stage, and

chemotherapy status distribution between these two

groups.

Results

Of those selected patients, thirty-one underwent adjuvant

RT and 40 didn’t. The characteristics were described in

Table 1. The median follow-up time was 26.87 months.

Regional lymph node recurrence alone was only noted in

one patient who didn’t undergo RT. Distant metastases

(DM) were noted in 17 patients (with RT: 8; without RT:

9). Out of those nine patients who developed DM and

didn’t undergo RT, five had been given chemotherapy. Age

is significantly related to worse OS (Pearson correlation

coefficient=-0.248, p=.037) but not to DFS (-0.191,

p=0.111). Positive LNs number is significantly related to

both worse OS (-0.244, p=0.041) and DFS (-0.261,

p=0.028). Adjuvant RT didn’t significantly improve OS

(median: 34.3 vs. 19.7 months, p=0.123) and DFS (median:

30 vs. 17.7 months, p=0.86) (Fig. 1). The patients received

adjuvant chemotherapy were with significantly longer OS

(median: 31.9 vs. 14.7 months, p=0.007) but not DFS

(median: 28.6 vs. 14 months, p=0.42).

Conclusion

Although the patients who underwent adjuvant CRT were

significantly younger, they were also with more advanced

diseases. Most of the recurrent events were distant

metastases in our study, indicating that D2 dissection

might have largely decreased the locoregional failure

rate. Adjuvant RT didn’t show significant benefit

prolonging OS or DFS. On the other hand, the patients

received adjuvant chemotherapy were observed to have

significantly longer OS but not DFS. It is possible that the

prolonged OS is correlated to the age of patients, rather

than a result of chemotherapy. Further randomized

controlled trials are required to draw a concrete

conclusion.

EP-1249 Changes in normal liver volume after high

dose radiation in cancer of the liver

K. Rajamanickam

1

, S. Chopra

1

, R. Engineer

1

, V. Ostwal

1

,

P. Patil

2

, S. Mehta

2

, E. Dhandpani

3

, K. Joshi

3

, S.K.

Shrivastava

1

1

Tata Memorial Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Mumbai,

India

2

Tata Memorial Hospital, Digestive Diseases and Clinical

Nutrition, Mumbai, India

3

Tata Memorial Hospital, Medical Physics, Mumbai, India

Purpose or Objective

To report liver volume changes and its impact on liver

function following hepatic radiation in patients with

primary or secondary hepatic malignancies.

Material and Methods

From Jan 2015 - April 2016, consecutive patients with

unresectable hepatic lesions (hepatocellular cancer

(HCC), Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or liver metastasis (LM))

who received either high dose radiation (HDRT) or

stereotactic radiation (SBRT) and without disease

progression were included. All patients were required to

have Child Pugh status A-B6 prior to radiation. Total liver

volume, gross tumour volume (GTV), normal liver volume

(total liver volume- GTV) was determined. Follow up scans

were used to determine changes, if any, in normal liver

volume. As the dose prescription of each patient was

individualised, biologically equivalent dose (BED) were