Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  736 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 736 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S720

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

metastases reported a pain flare (grade I), 5 patients with

lymph node metastases reported diarrhea (grade I in three

patients, grade II in two patients).

Conclusion

SBRT might safely and effectively be used to postpone ADT

in patients with oligometastatic recurrence of prostate

cancer.

EP-1357 moderate hypofractionated-imrt of prostate

bed after radical prostatectom : acute toxicity

J. Valero Albarran

1

, A. Ruiz Herrero

2

, A. Montero

1

, E.

Sanchez

1

, E. Castro

3

, D. Olmos

3

, M. Hernandez

1

, R.

Ciervide

1

, X. Chen

1

, B. Alvarez

4

, M. Garcia Aranda

4

, M.

Lopez

1

, M. Serrano

5

, L. Osorio

6

, M. Asenjo

7

, P. Fernandez

Leton

8

, A. Acosta

1

, O. Hernando Requejo

1

, C. Rubio

1

1

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro, Radiation Oncology,

Madrid, Spain

2

Infanta Cristina Hospital, Radiiation Oncology, Madrid,

Spain

3

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro, Medical Oncology,

Madrid, Spain

4

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro Radiation Oncology

Madrid, Radiation Oncology, Madrid, Spain

5

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro, Urology, Madrid,

Spain

6

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro Radiation Oncology

Madrid, Urology, Madrid, Spain

7

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro, Radiophisyc,

Madrid, Spain

8

Hospital University HM Sanchinarro, Radiophisic,

Madrid, Spain

Purpose or Objective

Hypofractionated radiation therapy as primary treatment

for prostate cancer is currently being investigated in large

phase 3 trials. However, evidences in post-operative

setting are scarce. We report our experience about

feasibility and acute toxicity of a moderate

hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy

(Hypo-IMRT) schedule for prostate cancer (PC) after

radical prostatectomy.

Material and Methods

From October 2015 to July 2016, 23 patients (pts) were

included for adjuvant (60,9%) or salvage radiation therapy

(39,1%). They were classified with

NCCN

criteria in: low (2

pts), intermediate (13 pts) and high risk (8 pts). Median

age was 63 years (range 55-77 years). Median PSA

pretreatment was 0.31ng/mL (range 0.04 – 4.38ng/mL).

Pathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Two internal gold-fiducial markers were placed

transperineally guided by transrectal ultrasound, in every

patient before treatment. CTV was countered according

to RTOG guidelines and expanded 3 mm posteriorly and 5

mm in all other direction to create the PTV. All patients

underwent treatment with IMRT up to a total dose of

62.5Gy in 25fx (2,5Gy/day) in a Novalis linac. Daily

verification was performed with IGRT-Exactrac®, and 6D-

robotic couch. Six (26%) patients received androgen

deprivation. Acute toxicity was assessed according to

RTOG/EORTC criteria and was recorded weekly during

treatment and one month after radiation therapy.

Gleason score:

6 7(3+4) 7(4+3) 8-10 9% 35% 26% 30%

Seminal vesicles invasion:

-Yes -No 17% 83%

Extracapsular extension:

-Yes -No 61% 39%

Positive

Margin

: -Yes -No 48% 52%

Perineural invasion:

-Yes -