Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  758 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 758 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S742

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

showed in the table 1) thus without affecting PTV

coverage (figure 1).

Figure1: DVH comparison between the two plans that gives

the best PTV coverage

Conclusion

Both 3D plans do not exceed kidneys QUANTEC reference

dose constraints. Doses under QUANTEC constraints can

cause renal dysfunction in long survivors, young patients

and oligometastatic patients. In these situations it is

important to consider VMAT planning that gives the

opportunity to reduce dose delivered to kidneys

decreasing the probability to develop a late renal

dysfunction and giving the opportunity for further toxic

renal drugs treatments.

EP-1404 Survival time following palliative whole brain

radiotherapy to treat brain metastases

A. Billfalk Kelly

1

, M. Dunne

1

, C. Faul

1

, O. McArdle

1

, I.

Fraser

1

, J. Coffey

1

, A. Boychak

1

, B.D. O'Neill

1

, D.

Fitzpatrick

1

1

St. Lukes Radiation Oncology Network, Radiation

Oncology, Dublin 6, Ireland

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate the overall survival times of patients with

brain metastases who were treated in our institution with

WBRT, comparing patients over and under 70 years old,

and between fractionation schedules.

Material and Methods

A retrospective review was carried out of patients treated

with WBRT over a two year period (2013-2014). Data was

collected with regards to the time of initial histological

diagnosis, dose delivered, age, in-or outpatient basis,

extracranial disease status, and time to death, or last

known follow up.

Results

101 patients were identified for analysis. The median age

was 64 years (range 32-88).

The radiotherapy was delivered as two opposed 6MV-10MV

photon beams, with shielding to the lenses. 50.5% of

patients were prescribed 30Gy in 10 fractions, 33.7% 20Gy

in 5 fractions and 15.8% patients were prescribed other

fractionation schemes. 29.7% were treated as inpatients,

and 70.3% as outpatients. The 4 most common histological

subtypes were NSCLC 42.6%, small cell lung carcinomas

19.8%, breast adenocarcinoma 14.9%, and malignant

melanoma 12.9%. 17.8% of patients had a biopsy or

resection of the brain metastases. 11.9% of patients

received stereotactic radiotherapy and 2% had already

received prophylactic cranial irradiation.

The median follow-up was 2.5 months (range: 2 days–30.5

months) from the end of RT. Median overall survival was

2.6 months (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.0). Overall survival at 1 year

was 24%.

All of those aged >70 years died. Overall survival differed

significantly between those < 70 years of age and those >

70 (p< .0005). Median overall survival at 12 months was

5.5% for those <70 years and 1.0 months for those >70

years. The hazard (risk of death) is higher and thus the

prognosis worse, for older patients controlling for RT dose

and Brain surgery or biopsy (p= .011).

Univariate analysis revealed that higher RT doses were

significantly associated with longer survival (p< .0005),

although this may be due to patients with better

performance status receiving 30Gy in 10 fractions as

opposed to 20Gy in 5 fractions.

Conclusion

Our review shows that survival for most patients is poor in

patients who have brain metastases treated with WBRT,

which is consistent with international data. 6.9% of

patients did not complete the prescribed course of

radiotherapy due to clinical deterioration, therefore some

patients may be better served with shorter courses of

radiotherapy, or treatment with steroids alone, in order

to minimise their time in hospital and to ensure maximum

quality of

life.

While WBRT does have a role in treating some patients

with brain metastases, as shown by the long survival of

some patients, they should be carefully selected,

particularly when considering treating elderly patients.

EP-1405 A Rapid Access Palliative Radiotherapy Clinic

to reduce waiting time in a Regional Cancer Centre

M. Morris

1

, T. O'Donovan

1

, B. Ofi

1

, A. Flavin

1

1

Cork University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cork,

Ireland

Purpose or Objective

In September 2014, the Rapid Access Palliative Clinic

[RAPC] was set up in the Radiation Oncology Department

in Cork University Hospital [CUH] a Regional Cancer Centre

in Ireland. Its purpose is to streamline the pathway and

facilitate prompt review and timely delivery of palliative

radiotherapy [PRT] for symptom relief of patients with

terminal cancer.

This study reviews the clinical activity of the RAPC over

the initial 3 months and compares it to a second 3 months

where the clinic was not available. The purpose of this

retrospective review is to evaluate if we are meeting the

objectives of the RAPC program.

Material and Methods

From the CUH oncology patient information system

(Lantis) database, we retrieved the number of patients

referred to the RAPC, their demographics, diagnosis and

treatment. We calculated the time interval between

referral to consultation, consultation to simulation and

the percentage of patients who started PRT on the day of