Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  82 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S69

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

Incidental dose to the cardiac atria and ventricles did not

improve RP risk prediction in our cohort of s tage III NSCLC

patients as the DVH parameters for lung o utperformed

those for the heart. The multivariable mo del containing

the variables cardiac comorbidity and MLD is the optimal

model for RP prediction in this cohort.

OC-0143 Adaptive radiotherapy reduces pneumonitis

without increasing the risk of failure in lung cancer

A.A. Khalil

1

, M.M. Knap

1

, M.T. Petersen

1

, M. Kandi

1

, H.H.

Schmidt

1

, D.S. Møller

2

, L. Hoffman

2

1

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology,

Aarhus C, Denmark

2

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Medical

Physics, Aarhus C, Denmark

THIS ABSTRACT FORMS PART OF THE MEDIA PROGRAMME

AND WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE DAY OF ITS

PRESENTATION TO THE CONFERENCE.

OC-0144 Dosimetric analysis of randomized lung proton

and photon plans with respect to radiation toxicity

T. Deist

1

, P. Yang

2

, C. Oberije

1

, P. Allen

2

, Y. Luo

2

, Y.

Van Wijk

1

, D. Gomez

2

, T. X u

2

, S. Tucker

3

, R. Mohan

4

, S.

Hahn

2

, P. Lambin

1

, Z. Liao

2

1

MAASTRO Clinic, Department of Radiotherapy,

Maastricht, The Netherlands

2

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,

Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA

3

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,

Department of Bioinformatics and Computational

Biology, Houston, USA

4

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,

Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, USA

Purpose or Objective

Results from a Bayesian-randomized trial on intensity

modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. passively scattered 3D

proton therapy (3DPT) show no significant difference in

protocol failure (i.e., either grade>=3 radiation

pneumonitis (RP) or local recurrence within 12 months).

We intend to analyze the differences in dose distribution

between modalities, relations between dosimetric

parameters and radiation-induced toxicities. The

objective is to identify dosimetric constraints that would

limit normal tissue complications in future trials.

Material and Methods

We analyzed 149 (57 3DPT, 92 IMRT) randomized trial

patients. DVH parameters for 3DPT and IMRT treatment

plans were compared for lung, esophagus, and heart. To

measure the predictive value of high- and low-dose

parameters for toxicity in lungs and esophagus, we fitted

V5 and V50Gy to RP and grade>=3 radiation esophagitis

(RE). Heart dose data was missing for 5 IMRT patients.

Results

RP and RE are not significantly different between

modalities (p>0.1, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test).

The difference between mean doses planned for IMRT and

3DPT plans was tested: Lung V5, V50, V60, V70Gy (in %),

esophageal V5Gy, and heart V5, V10Gy are significantly

different (p<0.005, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test).

The significant esophageal and heart dose parameters are

smaller for 3DPT, lung V5Gy is smaller, while lung

V50,V60,V70Gy are larger.

3DPT plan V5 and V50Gy are computed for each OAR and

compared to the respective median values of IMRT plans.

The percentage of 3DPT plans with V5Gy below or equal

to the IMRT median and V50Gy above the IMRT median are

reported:

<=V5Gy IMRT Median

>V50Gy IMRT Median

3DPT

Lung

0.93

0.68

Esophagus

0.67

0.49

Heart

0.93

0.54

3DPT plans yield smaller low dose regions in all three

OARs. However, 3DPT yields larger high dose regions in the

lungs.

To assess the relationship between low/high dose regions

and toxicity, V5 and V50Gy of lung and heart were fitted

to RP, esophageal V5 and V50Gy were fitted to RE:

There appears to be a stronger relationship between

toxicity and high dose regions in the affected OAR. Heart

doses have a weaker relationship with RP.

Conclusion

Tucker et al. (2013) showed that high dose regions in lung

tissue in lung IMRT have a pronounced effect on toxicity.

This is also observable in this trial cohort of IMRT and 3DPT

patients. In order to reduce toxicities, high dose regions

in normal tissues need to be reduced. 3DPT reduces low

dose regions significantly in all three OARs but high doses

regions are significantly higher in the lungs. Future

investigations should focus on stricter high dose

constraints for 3DPT plans. If such constraints are not

achievable due to penumbral and scattering

characteristics of protons and the usage of passive

scattering techniques, intensity modulated proton therapy

should be considered.

Joint Symposium: ESTRO-JASTRO: Oligometastatic

disease

SP-0145 Biological rationale and clinical evidence

P. Ost

1

1

University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium

In 1995, Hellman and Weichselbaum hypoth esized that

the number and location of the metastases are an

important prognostic factor reflecting the metastatic

phenotype and hence prognosis of the cancer patient.

They suggested this based on the historical observation