Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  979 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 979 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S963

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

2

Western General Hospital- Edinburgh Cancer Centre,

medical Physics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Purpose or Objective

To assess if the target coverage and dose to organs at risk

(OARs) from a vaginal vault brachytherapy CT plan are

representative of dose delivered during the actual

treatment.

Material and Methods

28 patients scheduled for post-operative vaginal vault

brachytherapy had an initial planning CT scan (CT1) done

a few days before the first fraction, with the vaginal

cylinder in-situ to generate a treatment plan. The PTV was

the cranial 4cm of the vagina to a depth of 0.5cm, and the

OARs outlined included the rectum, sigmoid, small

bowel and bladder. On the day of the first fraction the

patients has a second CT scan with the vaginal cylinder

(CT2) and the PTV and OARs were outlined. Then the plan

from CT1 was superimposed on CT2 to assess for variation

in V100 and d90 to the PTV and the d2cc to the OARs.

Prescribed dose was 21Gy in 3 fractions to the PTV, aiming

for a V100 of >95% and d90 of 7Gy per fraction.

Results

Total of 56 scans were analysed. Mean PTV V100 for CT1:

95.8% (range 99.6% - 83.2%); CT2: 96% (range 99.8% – 90%).

Mean d90 for CT1: 7.4Gy( range 7.8 – 6.7Gy); CT2: 7.3Gy

(range 7.9 – 6.3Gy). Mean difference in d90 per fraction

was 0.23 Gy per fraction (range: 0.56 – 0.01Gy).

Small

Bowel Sigmoid Rectum Bladder

Mean d2cc (Gy)

CT1

3.16

(range

7.0

-

0.3)

4.1

(range

6.4 - 1.9)

5.5

(rnage

7.0 - 3.9)

6.0

(range

6.7 - 4.9)

Mean d2cc (Gy)

CT2

3.18

(range

6.8

-

0.3)

3.8

(range

5.9 - 1.4)

5.6

(range

7.1 - 3.6)

6.0

(range

7.2 - 4.9)

Man difference

in d2cc between

CT1 and CT2

0.8

0.7

0.9

0.5

Conclusion

The variation in d2cc doses when using the initial CT plan

on the second scan taken on the day of the first fraction

were minimal and not clinically significant. Differences in

PTV coverage are mostly due to slight differences in PTV

outlining mainly because of changes in the angle of the

cylinder compared to the treatment couch. There does not

appear to be the need to plan every single fraction for

post-operative vaginal vault brachytherapy as the

dosimetry using the initial plan was representative of the

dose delivered on the day of treatment.

EP-1777 Cervical cancer outcomes in the high-dose-

rate brachytherapy era: A single institution experience

N. Alyamani

1

, G. Bhattacharya

1

, R. Samant

1

, C. E

1

, T.

Le

1

, K. Lupe

1

1

The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Radiation

Oncology, Ottawa, Canada¨

Purpose or Objective

Since 2008, the management of cervix cancer with primary

radiotherapy at our institution has included the use of HDR

(high-dose-rate) brachytherapy; prior to this, LDR (low-

dose-rate) brachytherapy was used. The aim of this study

is to review our experience with HDR brachytherapy and

to evaluate patient outcomes.

Material and Methods

A retrospective review of cervical cancer patients treated

with curative intent using radical external beam

radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy, from 2008 to 2014

inclusive was performed. Overall survival (OS) and

progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the

Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 76 patients were treated with radical

radiotherapy incorporating HDR brachytherapy during this

time period. The median age was 47 years with a median

follow-up of 38 months. The histology was squamous cell

carcinoma in 88% and adenocarcinoma in 11%. The

distribution according to stage was as follows: stage I 16%,

stage II 38%, stage III 40% and stage IV 5%. All patients

received weekly Cisplatin chemotherapy with a median of

5 cycles delivered. The median dose of external beam

radiotherapy was 45Gy delivered in 25 fractions over 5

weeks. The median brachytherapy dose was a total of

24Gy in 3 weekly fractions of 8Gy. The 5-year OS and PFS

rates were 74% and 63% respectively. The 5-year

locoregional control rate was 82%. There were a total of

25 failure and 12 of these had a component of local

failure. However, only 3 of these had exclusively local

failure. Of note is that the majority of patients with

recurrences had a component of distant failure (19/25;

representing 77% of relapses). Using the Common

Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0

(CTCAE v.4.0), it appears as though severe acute (Grade

3/4) Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicity

was present in approximately 21% of patients, along with

Grade 3/4 Hematologic toxicity seen in 34%. These results

are similar to the published literature and compare

favorably with our previous LDR brachytherapy

experience.

Conclusion

There has been a shift towards incorporation of HDR

brachytherapy world-wide in the management of cervix

cancer and our institutional experience indicates that

long-term outcomes for patients remain good, with

generally high rates of local control.

EP-1778 Combined intracavitary-interstitial IGABT of

cervical cancer –First dosimetric experience in

Hungary

G. Fröhlich

1

, J. Vízkeleti

1

, N.N. Anhhong

1

, N. Mészáros

1

,

T. Major

1

, C. Polgár

1

1

National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy,

Budapest, Hungary

Purpose or Objective

Dosimetric evaluation of combined intracavitary-

interstitial high-dose-rate image-guided adaptive

brachytherapy (IGABT) of cervical cancer, implemented in

Hungary.

Material and Methods

Since April 2016, 9 patients with cervical cancer were

treated with overall 22 fractions of combined

intracavitary-interstitial IGABT. After transrectal US-

guided implantation of Utrecht or Fletcher applicator and

needles, High-Risk-CTV (HR-CTV), bladder (b), rectum (r)

and sigmoid (s) were contoured on CT, based on the post-

teletherapy MRI of the patients. Dose-volume criterions of

treatment plans were based on the recommendations of

GEC-ESTRO Gyn WG. Treatment plans were compared to

the conventional intracavitary 2D plans (the dose was

prescribed to point A) and to CT-based 3D optimized plans

(without needles) with Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis

ANOVA and Spearman rank correlation tests.

Results

Median number of implanted needles was 3 (range: 2-4),

mean volume of HR-CTV was 39.8 cm

3

(8.3-100.2 cm

3

). For

intracavitary-interstitial IGABT, intracavitary 2D and

intracavitary 3D optimized plans, difference was found

almost in all dose-volume parameters: V100 were 90.4%,

83% and 87.1% (p=0.043), DHI were 0.34, 0.30 and 0.27

(p=0.0137), D2(b) were 4.8 Gy, 6.9 Gy and 5.9 Gy (p<001),

D2(r) were 3.3 Gy, 6.6 Gy and 3.5 Gy (p<0.001), D2(s) were