Previous Page  46 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

44

ACQ

Volume 12, Number 1 2010

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Muir J. A., Gray, R.,

Haynes, B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based

medicine: What it is and what it isn’t.

British Medical Journal

,

312

, 71–72.

Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2006). Making evidence-

based decisions about child language interventions in

schools.

Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools

,

37

, 304–315.

Greenhalgh, T. (2001).

How to read a paper

. 2nd ed.

London: BMJ Publishing Group.

Nelson, T. D., & Steele, R. G. (2006). Beyond efficacy

and effectiveness: A multifaceted approach to treatment

evaluation.

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

,

37

, 389–397.

Correspondence to:

Dr Jenny Harasty

Speech Pathology Australia National Advisor

Research and Evidence Based Practice

email:

jharasty@bigpond.net.au

Deborah

Theodoros

be due to the global effect of increased loudness and effort

affecting other subsystems of the speech mechanism

beyond the respiratory-laryngeal systems. This study in

which people were treated with either LSVT

®

or traditional

dysarthria therapy revealed that both treatments, when

delivered intensively (one hour per day, four days per week,

for four weeks) resulted in significant improvements in

certain aspects of speech production (Wenke, Theodoras, &

Cornwell, 2008, 2009).

Future research in motor speech disorders will continue

to pursue the development of treatment protocols based

on the principles of motor learning and neuroplasticity, and

on technology-based methods of service delivery which will

assist clinicians to meet the health challenges of the future.

References

Hill, A.J., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T. & Ward, E. C. (in

press). The re-design and re-evaluation of an Internet-based

telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in

adults.

Telemedicine and eHealth

.

Hill, A., Theodoros, D. G., Russell, T., & Ward, E. C.

(2009). Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech

in adults.

International Journal of Language and

Communication Disorders

,

44

(5), 731–747.

Wenke, R., Theodoros, D., & Cornwell, P. (2009).

Effectiveness of the LSVT® on hypernasality in non-

progressive dysarthria: The need for further research.

International Journal of Language and Communication

Disorders

, iFirst, 1–23.

Wenke, R., Theodoros, D., & Cornwell, P. (2008). The

short and long term effectiveness of the LSVT® for dysarthria

following TBI and stroke.

Brain Injury

,

22

, 339–352.

Historically, research in motor speech

disorders at the University of Queensland has focused on the

assessment of dysarthria and apraxia of speech utilising

perceptual, acoustic, and instrumental techniques in order to

investigate the underlying pathophysiology of these

disorders. Such research continues to be conducted in

various populations such as traumatic brain injury,

Friedreich’s ataxia, stroke, and Parkinson’s disease (PD).

More recently, however, research in motor speech disorders

has involved the development of alternative service delivery

models, and investigations of treatment efficacy.

Over the last five years, researchers in the Telerehabilitation

Research Unit

(www.uq.edu.au/telerehabilitation)

have

developed and validated telerehabilitation applications

to assess and treat people with motor speech disorders

across the Internet. This mode of service delivery has the

potential to overcome the difficulties encountered by many

people living in rural and remote areas, and those with a

disability, in accessing therapy services. One study in this

area involved the assessment and treatment of hypokinetic

dysarthria online using the Lee Silverman Treatment

(LSVT

®

) program. Results from this randomised controlled

trial revealed that significant improvements in speech and

voice, comparable to those achieved face-to-face, can be

achieved in people with PD when treated across the Internet

(submitted for publication). In another study, the online

assessment of dysarthria and apraxia of speech has been

found to be comparable to results obtained face-to-face

(Hill, Theodoras, Russell, & Ward, in press; Hill, Theodoras,

Russell, & Ward, 2008). Research in telerehabilitation has

led to the development of eHAB

®

, a portable multi-media

videoconferencing unit which connects to the Internet via

the mobile telephone network. This system is designed to be

placed in the person’s home.

Treatment efficacy research in motor speech disorders

has involved an investigation into the effectiveness of the

LSVT

®

in the management of dysarthric speakers with non-

progressive dysarthria. Although originally developed for the

treatment of hypokinetic dysarthria, the LSVT

®

has been

shown in single case studies to improve speech intelligibility

in other types of dysarthria. These results are thought to

Motor speech disorders

research at UQ

Deborah Theodoros

Correspondence to:

Deborah Theodoros, PhD

Professor and Head

Division of Speech Pathology

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

The University of Queensland, Brisbane

email:

d.theodorus@uq.edu.au

Research update