GAZETTE
JULY/AUGUST 1991
Vital Issues of Trade Union Law
NUJ, IPU & others. Applicants, and Noel Martin Sisk
(Registrar of Friendly Societies)
and
others. Respondents, Judicial Review, High Court, 31 July, 1990, Keane, J., Supreme Court,
20 June, 1991.
Trade Union Law, especially regarding registration and mergers, is
often overshadowed within the wider area of Labour Law which
generally focuses on employment and dismissal aspects. The
importance and complexity of Trade Union registration law,
however, are apparent from a recent decision of Mr. Justice Keane
in the High Court,
1
" which was reversed by the Supreme Court.
1b
Summary of Case
The Irish Print Union (IPU) wished
to transfer its engagements (in
general terms, a type of merger) to
the National Union of Journalists
(NUJ). The Registrar of Friendly
Societies is the Registrar of trade
unions for the purposes of the
Principal Act, the Trade Union Act,
1871, and also the Trade Union Act,
1975 dealing with mergers. The
Registrar's approval of relevant
documents is required before a
transfer of engagements can be
completed.
2
The first respondent, Mr. Noel
Martin Sisk, solicitor and current
Registrar, declined to register the
transfer of engagements. The
reason for the Registrar's decision
was that he was satisfied that the
jurisdiction of the Trade Union Act,
1975, and therefore of the
Registrar, is limited to trade unions
registered in the State. (There is an
exception, under Section 9 of the
1975 Act, to cover the other side
of the coin: Where a majority of
members of a British-based trade
union in the State and Northern
Ireland wish to merge with a trade
union registered in the State). The
NUJ was was not registered in the
State, and could not be regarded as
a trade union for the purposes of
the Trade Union Act, 1975.
The NUJ, a British-based union
operating in Ireland on a branch
basis, is not registered with the
Registrar of Friendly Societies,
Dublin. (The NUJ does, however,
have a negotiation licence granted
by the Minister for Industry and
Commerce, now Labour under the
Trade Union Act, 1941). A judicial
review of the Registrar's refusal to
register the transfer of engage-
ments was sought, together with
an order of certiorari quashing the
Registrar's decision.
Mr. Justice Keane, in the High
Court, was satisfied that the
Registrar was entirely correct in the
decision he arrived at. The Court
upheld the Registrar's decision
because there was no legislative
basis providing that a trade union
registered in the State could
amalgamate with or transfer its
engagements to one not so
registered. The learned Judge re-
jected an extra-territorial construct-
ion of the legislation and also
by
Anthony P. Quinn,
Barrister-at-Law,
MA , B. Comm,
FIIS,
Dip. Public Adm; A.C.I. Arb.*
arguments by Mrs. Mary Robinson,
S.C., counsel for applicants, based
on freedom of association, Article
40.6.1 (iii) of the Irish Constitution.
Comment and Legislative
Background
The Registrar's decision, as upheld
by the High Court, raises vital
points regarding trade union
registration law and the position of
British-based unions operating in
the State. The outcome of the
Registrar's decision and the High
Court review, however, seems
logical and correct having regard to
existing law on trade unions in the
Irish jurisdiction: The Trade Union
Act, 1871, a landmark Statute and
still the principal Act in the Irish
jurisdiction; some smaller amend-
ing Acts, including 1876 and 1913
and the fairly technical Trade Union
Act, 1975 on mergers by amal-
gamation (formation of new union)
and transfer of engagements
(transferor union ceases to exist
but transferee union retains its
existence). Transferor unions some-
times retain their indentity inform-
ally as a branch or section of the
transferee union.
Trade Union Act
r
1975 (No. 4 of
1975)
The main relevant provisions are as
follows:
Sect. 1: "Trade Union", save where
the context otherwise requires, has
the same meaning as in the Trade
Union Acts, 1871-1971.
Sect. 2 (3): Subject to the Act, a
trade union may transfer its en-
gagements to another trade union.
Sect. 3: There are strict conditions
for amalgamations or transfers of
engagement, e.g. members' voting
by secret ballot, and notification of
members re holding the ballot.
Sect. 6: The legal instrument of
amalgamation or transfer shall not
take effect before it is registered by
Registrar.
Sect. 10: The Registrar has import-
ant powers including adjudicating
on complaints by union members
regarding resolutions on amalgama-
tions or transfers of engagements.
The Registrar's power under
Sect. 10 (9), purporting to exclude
investigation of the validity of a
resolution approving an instrument
of transfer or amalgamation, in any
legal proceedings except those
Anthony P. Quinn
239