GAZETTE
i SEPTEMBER 1991
Moot Court Competition
The valuable role which "mooting"
can play in the education of a
lawyer is undisputed. A tradition of
holding moot court competitions
and, indeed, of making parti-
cipation in such competitions a
compulsory part of a course of legal
study, is common in other
jurisdictions, particularly in civil
law countries and in the United
States. Ireland has been slow to
follow suit, although individual
universities have organised such
events internally over a number of
years.
It is now hoped that such a
tradition may be developed here
over the next few years and, to
this end, the Irish Moot Court
Committee has been established.
The Committee, with Mr. Justice
Niall McCarthy of the Supreme
Court as its President, is planning
to hold two major events in the
coming year. The first will be the
preliminary rounds and national
final of the Philip C. Jessup
International Law Moot Court
Competition. This event is one
which is well known to Irish law
students as they have been
participating therein for a number
of years and have had some
considerable success. This event is
concerned with public international
law and invariably the problem to
be addressed is topical and
stimulating. This competition will
be held in early February and the
winners will travel to Washington in
April, 1992 to participate in the
international competition.
The Committee will also be
organising a new event in the form
of the National Moot Court
Competition. This competition will
involve domestic law. The
substantive area of law addressed
will change from year to year.
Participants will be recruited from
the university law faculties and
from the professional schools. The
following institutions will be
requested to send teams: the
Solicitors' Apprentices Debating
Society of Ireland; the King's Inns
Debating Society; the Institute for
Professional Legal Studies, Belfast;
Trinity College, Dublin; University
College Dublin; University College
Cork; University College Galway;
Queen's University Belfast; Dublin
City University; University of
Limerick and the University of
Ulster.
So what happens in a moot court
competition and how will those
who participate benefit? In
competitions of this nature, a
factual legal problem is formulated
which encapsulates certain novel
points of law. Participants form
themselves into groups of four and
each team must then set about
preparing a written and an oral
response to the problem. Written
submissions in the f o rm of
memorials are submi t t ed in
advance of the oral hearing and
students' performance is judged on
the contents of their written
submission as well as on the oral
presentation made to the judges
who may question the participants
on the arguments advocated by
them. Moo t i ng affords the
participants an opportunity to put
the law which they have learned
into a practical context and also
develops skills in advocacy.
Students must have a thorough
knowledge of their subject as they
do not know what questions will be
posed by the judges. They must be
able to think on their feet, due to
the time limits which are imposed.
Lengthy periods spent considering
questions posed will result in points
being lost.
Mooting is also an enjoyable
spectator sport! The audience is
given an outline of the problem and
can follow the submissions made.
The novel styles of presentation
used by some mooters can be very
entertaining.
The Committee is presently
seeking sponsorship for both
competitions. Solicitors' firms may
well see these events as performing
a useful role in recruitment and,
therefore, may wish to have an
involvement with these events.
Further i n f orma t i on may be
obtained by contacting Eoin O'Dell
or Liz Heffernan at the Law School,
Trinity College Dublin 2 or by
contacting Nuala Jackson at the
Law Library.
IBA CONDEMNS COUP
Law Society President, Donal
Binchy, was co-signatory to a re-
cent statement by the International
Bar Association following the
attempted coup in the USSR.
The statement, issued after a
meeting of International Bar
Leaders at the Canadian Bar
Association in Calgary, Alberta,
expressed the concern of the
international legal community at
the violation of the rule of law and
constitutional due process per-
petrated by the instigators of the
coup. The statement was issued on
August 22 within days of the
dramatic events taking place.
The full text of the statement
read as follows: —
"The President and representatives
of the following national bar
associations and law societies
express the concern of the
international legal community at
the violations of the rule of law and
constitutional due process per-
petrated in the past days in the
Soviet Union, reaffirm the supre-
macy of the rule of law in the world
and manifest their solidarity and full
support for the Soviet lawyers and
the Soviet people in their struggle
to reinstate constitutional due pro-
cess and the rule of law in the
Soviet Union."
In addition to Donal Binchy, the
signatories to the statement
were: —
Mr. Guiseppe Bisconti, President
IBA; J.J. Camp, President of the
Canadian Bar Association; Tony
Holland of The Law Society of
England and Wales; Judith Potter,
President, The Law Society of New
Zealand; J.A. Cameron, Q.C., Vice
Dean of the Faculty of Advocates,
Scotland; Henrin Grondin, Presi-
dent, Union Internationale des
Avocats, An t hony Scrivener,
Chairman, Bar of England and
Wales; James H. Campbell,
President of The Law Society of
Scotland.
The statement was prepared
following contacts with Soviet
Lawyers based in New York.
According to Giuseppe Bisconti,
President of the International Bar
Association, upon learning of the
statement of support the Soviet
representatives said, " we are
very grateful and we shall never
forget."
•
268