Previous Page  425 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 425 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1991

Valuation for Capital Acquisitions Tax

and Stamp Duty Purposes

The introduction of the surcharge for Stamp Duty undervaluation

in section 103 Finance Act, 1991 has highlighted again the very

dangerous area of "valuation" for tax purposes. A similar provision

was introduced in Section 79 Finance Act, 1989 in relation to

capital acquisitions tax although the penalties are not so draconian

as in the, later legislation. In addition therefore, to the difficulties

it causes on future disposals for capital gains tax purposes,

undervaluation of property for both taxes is a serious risk in respect

of currant transactions.

Pre-surcharge situation

An artificially low base cost has its

own penalty when the property is

disposed of. The undervaluation on

acquisition will be exaggerated by

indexation:

For example, property acquired

on 1 May, 1986 under a

voluntary disposition, from

father to son, the real value

being £65,000 but the value

submitted was, inadvertently,

£50,000 for stamp duty and gift

tax purposes. No great dis-

cussion took place and the

Revenue "accepted" the valu-

ation as submitted.

This property was disposed of

on 1 September, 1991 for

£100,000. Ignoring legal costs,

and the stamp duty on acqui-

sition the result is as shown in

Table 1 below.

The introduction of the surcharges

makes such errors much more

expensive for the taxpayer, and will

cause the Revenue to investigate

the valuation of property more

thoroughly.

Stamp Duty

Section 103 Finance Act, 1991

covers the provisions relating to

under-value for stamp duty

purposes.

Once the instrument operates or is

deemed to operate as a voluntary

disposition under Section 74

Finance (1909/10) Act, 1910 or

Section 24 Finance Act, 1949, and

the statement of value of such

property or minimum amount of

value referred to in Section 24

("the submitted value") is less than

the value as ultimately agreed with

Disposal

Acquisition £50,000

Indexation 1.218

Indexed acquisition cost

£100,000

£60,900

Gain

Annual allowance

£39,100

£4,000

Taxable Gain

Tax at 35%

£35,100

£12,285

The position should have been:

Disposal

Acquisition £65,000

Indexation 1.218

Indexed acquisition cost

£100,000

£79,170

Gain

Annual allowance

£20,830

£4,000

Taxable Gain

Tax at 35%

£16,830

£5,890

The difference, £6,395.

by

Brian Bohan BL,

Solicitor,

(Chairman Law Society

Taxation Committee

1990-1991)

the Revenue Commissioners (the

"ascertained value") by certain

percentages, the surcharge be-

comes payable. Those percentages

are:

Surcharge as %

of duty

Where the submitted value is less

than the ascertained value by an

amount which is greater than 10%

but not greater than 30% of the

ascertained value - (subject to the

minimum difference in value of

£5,000).

50%

Where the submitted value is less

than the ascertained value by an

amount which is greater than 30%

but not greater than 50% of the

ascertained value.

100%

Where the submitted value is less

than the ascertained value by an

amount which is greater than 50%.

200%

This surcharge is mandatory under

the legislation except that in

subsection (1) it is stated to be a

penalty and under section 100(3),

Finance Act, 1991 the Commis-

sioners may, if they think fit, remit

any

penalty payable on stamping.

It is to be hoped that this will be

availed of to a great extent in view

of the draconian provisions of the

stamp duty legislation.

407