Previous Page  117 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

related

to

this

type of procedure nor did

they use

AP

cephalometry

transverse measurements. Only

one

other

study was

found

using

CT

tomography with

the

aim of

comparing

facial

growth between

8

children

who

had

unilateral

surgical

treatment

including

the

external

approach,

ESS

and

the

combined

approach

for

orbital

complications

(mainly,

but

not

only

SPOA)

to

19

adults with

or

without

sinusitis

[1]

.

In

another

study

by

Van

Peteghem

et

al.,

lateral

cephalometric

measurements

were

reported

for

a

very

specific

group

of

cystic

fibrosis

children

having

extensive

functional

endoscopic

sinus

surgery,

reporting

no

statistically

significant differences between different age groups

[15]

. However,

AP

cephalometry

was

not

performed

and

all

patients

have

had

bilateral

surgery.

In

our

study,

only minimal

changes

in

facial

volume measure-

ments were

found,

confirming

the

clinical

impression

that

ESS

in

the

pediatric

population

is

safe.

Our

study

design

has

contributed

substantially

to

our

conclu-

sion

in

several ways.

First of

all, only one

side was operated upon,

saving

the

other

side

to

serve

as

a

control

group

in

the

same

patient. Second, all patients had comparable significant endoscopic

surgery

in which

the ethmoid cells and

the

lamina papyracea were

resected

extensively. Needless

to

say,

such

an

extensive

uniform

procedure

is

not

common

in

the

pediatric

population.

Third,

all

procedures were

performed

by

the

same

surgeon,

and

last

of

all,

the cephalometric

imaging provides

the major advantage of better

enabling

evaluation

of

facial measurements.

The study had

limitations, and

the

results should be

interpreted

with

caution. The

sample

size was

small,

cephalometric measure-

ments are prone

to errors

(due

to

the

technique and measurement

process),

and

lastly,

the

children were of different

ages

at

surgery,

and

as

a

consequence

different

ages

at

the

time

of

cephalometry

and

evaluation

of measurements.

5. Conclusions

In

the

present

study

sample,

no

significant

differences

were

found

in

craniofacial

growth

between

the

sides

of

the

face

in

children.

These

children went

through

ESS

for

the

same medical

indication

on

one

side

of

the

face,

and

this

side was

compared

to

the

other

non-operable

side, with measurements

using

anterior-

posterior

cephalometry.

References

[1]

B. Senior, A. Wirtschafter, C. Mai, C. Becker, W. Belenky, Quantitative impact of pediatric sinus surgery on facial growth, Laryngoscope 110 (11) (2000) 1866– 1870

.

[2]

G. Wolf, K. Greistorfer, J.A. Jebeles, The endoscopic endonasal technique in the treatment of chronic recurring sinusitis, Rhinology 33 (Jun (2)) (1995) 97–103.

[3]

M.R. Bothwell, J.F. Piccirillo, R.P. Lusk, B.D. Ridenour, Long-term outcome of facial growth after functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126 (6) (2002) 628–634.

[4]

E.A. Mair, W.E. Bolger, E.A. Breisch, Sinus and facial growth after pediatric endoscopic sinus surgery, Arch Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 121 (1995) 547–552

.

[5]

G. Wolf, W. Anderhuber, F. Kuhn, The development of the paranasal sinus in children: implications for paranasal sinus surgery, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 102 (1993) 70.

[6]

L.G. Farkas, Craniofacial Examination in Medicine Anthropometric Measurement, Raven Press, New York, NY, 1994

.

[7]

R.P. Lusk, H.R. Muntz, Endoscopic sinus surgery in children with chronic sinusitis: a pilot study, Laryngoscope 100 (1990) 654–658.

[8]

C.W. Gross, M.J. Gurucharri, R.H. Lazar, T.E. Long, Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in the pediatric age group, Laryngoscope 99 (3) (1989) 272–275

.

[9]

K.M. Carpenter, S.M. Graham, R.J. Smith, Facial skeletal growth after endoscopic sinus surgery in the piglet model, Am J Rhinol 11 (1997) 211–217.

[10]

E.A. Mair, W.E. Bolger, E.A. Breisch, Sinus and facial growth after pediatric endoscopic sinus surgery, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 121 (1995) 547–552.

[11]

J.R. Kosko, B.E. Hall, D.E. Tunkel, Acquired maxillary sinus hypoplasia: a conse- quence of endoscopic sinus surgery, Laryngoscope 106 (1996) 1210–1213

.

[12]

V.J. Lund, D.J. Howard, W.I. Wei, A.D. Cheesman, Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses—a 17 year experience, Head Neck 20 (1999) 97–105

.

[13]

A. Van Peteghem, P.A. Clement, Influence of extensive functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) on facial growth in children with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of 10 cephalometric parameters of the midface for three study groups, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 70 (2006) 1407–1413

.

[14]

E. Eviatar, T. Lazarovitch, H. Gavriel, The correlation of microbiology growth between subperiosteal orbital abscess and affected sinuses in young children, Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 26 (Nov–Dec (6)) (2012) 489–492

.

[15]

A. Van Peteghem, P.A. Clement, Influence of extensive functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) on facial growth in children with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of 10 cephalometric parameters of the midface for three study groups, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 70 (8) (2006) 1407–1413

.

L.

Sagi

et

al.

/

International

Journal

of

Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

79

(2015)

690–693

95