Previous Page  90 / 232 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 90 / 232 Next Page
Page Background

Quality of Life and Obstructive

Sleep Apnea Symptoms After

Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy

Susan L. Garetz, MD

a

, Ron B. Mitchell, MD

b

, Portia D. Parker, MS

c

, Reneé H. Moore, PhD

d

, Carol L. Rosen, MD

e

,

Bruno Giordani, PhD

f

, Hiren Muzumdar, MD

g

, Shalini Paruthi, MD

h

, Lisa Elden, MD

i

, Paul Willging, MD

j

,

Dean W. Beebe, PhD

k

, Carole L. Marcus, MBBCh

l

, Ronald D. Chervin, MD, MS

m

, Susan Redline, MD, MPH

n

abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

Data from a randomized, controlled study of adenotonsillectomy for obstructive

sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were used to test the hypothesis that children undergoing surgery had greater

quality of life (QoL) and symptom improvement than control subjects. The objectives were to compare changes

in validated QoL and symptom measurements among children randomized to undergo adenotonsillectomy or

watchful waiting; to determine whether race, weight, or baseline OSAS severity in

fl

uenced changes in QoL and

symptoms; and to evaluate associations between changes in QoL or symptoms and OSAS severity.

METHODS:

Children aged 5 to 9.9 years with OSAS (

N

= 453) were randomly assigned to undergo

adenotonsillectomy or watchful waiting with supportive care. Polysomnography, the Pediatric Quality of Life

inventory, the Sleep-Related Breathing Scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, the 18-item Obstructive Sleep

Apnea QoL instrument, and the modi

fi

ed Epworth Sleepiness Scale were completed at baseline and 7 months.

Changes in the QoL and symptom surveys were compared between arms. Effect modi

fi

cation according to race and

obesity and associations between changes in polysomnographic measures and QoL or symptoms were examined.

RESULTS:

Greater improvements in most QoL and symptom severity measurements were observed in children

randomized to undergo adenotonsillectomy, including the parent-completed Pediatric Quality of Life inventory

(effect size [ES]: 0.37), the 18-item Obstructive Sleep Apnea QoL instrument (ES:

0.93), the modi

fi

ed Epworth

Sleepiness Scale score (ES:

0.42), and the Sleep-Related Breathing Scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire

(ES:

1.35). Effect modi

fi

cation was not observed by obesity or baseline severity but was noted for race in some

symptom measures. Improvements in OSAS severity explained only a small portion of the observed changes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Adenotonsillectomy compared with watchful waiting resulted in signi

fi

cantly more

improvements in parent-rated generic and OSAS-speci

fi

c QoL measures and OSAS symptoms.

WHAT

S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT:

Pediatric

obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has

been associated with decreased health-related

quality of life (QoL). Observational studies

suggest that adenotonsillectomy for pediatric

OSAS improves QoL, but these studies did not use

a randomized study design or a control group of

children with OSAS managed nonsurgically.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:

A prospective,

randomized controlled study of adenotonsillectomy

for pediatric OSAS showed signi

fi

cantly greater QoL

and symptom improvements in children

undergoing adenotonsillectomy than in the

nonsurgical control arm. The extent of

improvement was not appreciably in

fl

uenced by

baseline OSAS severity or obesity.

a

Department of Otolaryngology

Head and Neck Surgery and Sleep Disorders Center,

f

Departments of Psychiatry and

Psychology and Sleep Disorders Center, and

m

Department of Neurology and Sleep Disorders Center, University of

Michigan Health Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan;

b

Departments of Otolaryngology and Pediatrics, Utah Southwestern

and Children

s Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;

c

SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina;

d

Department of Statistics, North

Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina;

e

Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children

s Hospital,

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio;

g

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Allergy, & Immunology, Children

s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of

Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

h

Department of Pediatrics, Cardinal Glennon Children

s Medical Center, Saint

Louis University, St Louis, Missouri; Departments of

i

Otolaryngology and

l

Pediatrics, Sleep Center, Children

s Hospital

of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

j

Department of Otolaryngology

Head and Neck

Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, and

k

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children

s Hospital

Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and

n

Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women

s Hospital, and

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

This trial has been registered at

www.clinicaltrials.gov

(identi

fi

er NCT00560859).

www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2014-0620

DOI:

10.1542/peds.2014-0620

Accepted for publication Nov 4, 2014

PEDIATRICS

Volume

135,

number

2,

February

2015

ARTICLE

Reprinted by permission of Pediatrics. 2015; 135(2):e477-e486.

68