Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  38 / 104 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 104 Next Page
Page Background

visit

stack.net.au

DVD

&

BD

FEATURE

38

jbhifi.com.au

JULY

2016

DVD

&

BD

If you're an adventurous viewer who's eager to leave the comfort zone of generic

Hollywood blockbusters, let

STACK

point you towards strange and exciting new

frontiers in cinema – from the grindhouse to the arthouse and beyond.

Words: Scott Hocking

[Note: Some titles discussed may not be available on DVD and Blu-ray, so please check the JB Hi-Fi website.]

WHAT TO EXPECT

Films in which nature runs amok are

essentially an offshoot of the disaster movie.

Instead of earthquakes, towering

infernos and erupting volcanos, it's

killer sharks and bears, or swarms

of insects and arachnids wreaking

havoc. They also don't feature the

big name casts that disaster films

used to attract, but work just fine

with dependable tough guy actors

like Christopher George, William

Shatner, Joe Don Baker and Sam

Elliott in the leading roles (although

1978's A-lister laden

The Swarm

was a major exception).

So why does nature rebel against

us in these movies? The reasons are

many and varied but the usual culprit

is some kind of threat to their environment –

toxic waste, pollutants and pesticides can all

turn the most placid tarantula or slug into a

vicious killer. Some of the catalysts are more

outrageous – PCP pumped into a zoo's water

supply (

Wild Beasts

, 1984), or the depletion of

the ozone layer by fluorocarbons (

Day of the

Animals

, 1977). A lot of the time there's no

reason, it's just predators doing what they do.

(There are also mutations from

genetic tampering, frequently

of the oversized variety, but

that's a subject for another

chapter.)

An expert in whatever

branch of zoology is relevant

will be called in to discover

what's behind all the animal

aggro – usually a pretty

female scientist to provide

a romantic interest for the

film's macho park ranger/

sheriff/hero. Sometimes a

Native American will offer up

some mystical explanation as

an alternative to the scientific one (

Nightwing

and

Prophecy

, 1979).

The initial attacks are on individuals and will

appear random, but as in any decent disaster

movie, there's always some kind of town fair,

festival or community event where maximum

mayhem can erupt for the film's climax. And of

course there will be an arrogant official who's

more concerned with tourism and profits than

people being eaten, and will refuse to close the

beach/national park or call off the county fair.

The formula remains consistent regardless of

the type of species attacking, which is usually

the title of the movie anyway, so you know

exactly what you're in for.

WHERE TO START

Alfred Hitchcock's

The Birds

is the seminal

nature runs amok movie, but it was

Jaws

that

established the template just discussed, so

you should really start there. Shark attacks

are a hazard whenever we venture into their

domain, but few films have incited the kind of

phobia over a dip in the ocean as Spielberg's

masterpiece did on its release in the summer

of '75.

Jaws

not only created the event movie

blockbuster, it also spawned the nature runs

amok sub-genre, being swiftly followed by

William Girdler's killer bear movie

Grizzly

(1976) – pitched as "

Jaws

with claws" and also

required viewing, albeit extremely difficult to

find these days.

BEGINNER’S

GUIDE

#4 - NATURE RUNS AMOK

Following the success of Spielberg's classic

Jaws

in 1975,

filmmakers seized the opportunity to capitalise on animals on the

rampage. Suddenly every conceivable species on the planet began

attacking humankind, from the ferocious (bears, alligators, dogs) and

the innocuous (worms, cockroaches, frogs), to the just plain ridiculous

(rabbits, slugs, shrews). This horror sub-genre was most popular

during the '70s and early '80s, but wrathful wildlife continues to rise

up against us on the screen to this very day.