![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0092.jpg)
Version 2.2015, 03/11/15 © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2015, All rights reserved.
The NCCN Guidelines® and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN®.
MS-17
NCCN Guidelines Index
Breast Cancer Table of Contents
Discussion
NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2015
Breast Cancer
and placement of image-detectable marker(s) should be considered to
demarcate
the tumor bed for any future (post-chemotherapy) surgical
management. Clinically positive ALN should be sampled by FNA or core
biopsy and the positive nodes must be removed following preoperative
systemic therapy at the time of definitive operation. Patients with
clinically negative ALNs should have axillary ultrasound prior to
neoadjuvant treatment. For those with clinically suspicious ALNs, the
panel recommends consideration of either a core biopsy or FNA of
these nodes.
152
. If FNA or core biopsy indicates any positive nodes,
these should be removed following neoadjuvant therapy at the time of
definitive surgery.
According to the NCCN Panel, axillary staging after preoperative
systemic therapy may include sentinel node biopsy or level I/II
dissection. Level I/II dissection should be done when patients are
proven node positive prior to neoadjuvant therapy (category 2B). The
false-negative rate of SLN biopsy in either the pre- or
post-chemotherapy settings is low.
132,153,154
Nevertheless, the possibility
remains that a pathologic complete response (pCR) following
chemotherapy may occur in lymph node metastases previously
undetected by clinical exam. An SLN excision can be considered before
administering preoperative systemic therapy, because it provides
additional information to guide local and systemic treatment
decisions.
155,156
In the event that SLN resection is performed after
administration of preoperative systemic therapy, both the
pre-chemotherapy clinical and the post-chemotherapy pathologic nodal
stages must be used to determine the risk of local recurrence. Close
communication between members of the multidisciplinary team,
including the pathologist, is particularly important when any treatment
strategy involving preoperative systemic therapy is planned.
In some patients, preoperative systemic therapy results in sufficient
tumor response that makes breast-conserving therapy possible.
Because complete or near-complete clinical responses are common,
the use of percutaneously placed clips into the breast under
mammographic or ultrasound guidance or other method of localizing
pre-chemotherapy tumor volume aids in the post-chemotherapy
resection of the original area of tumor and is encouraged. The results of
the NSABP B-18 trial show that breast conservation rates are higher
after preoperative systemic therapy.
157
However, preoperative systemic
therapy has no demonstrated disease-specific survival advantage over
postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II tumors.
NSABP B-27 is a three-arm, randomized, phase III trial of women with
invasive breast cancer treated with preoperative systemic therapy with
AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) for 4 cycles followed by local
therapy alone, preoperative AC followed by preoperative docetaxel for 4
cycles followed by local therapy, or AC followed by local therapy
followed by 4 cycles of postoperative docetaxel. Results from this study,
which involved 2411 women, documented a higher rate of complete
pathologic response at the time of local therapy in patients treated
preoperatively with 4 cycles of AC followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel
versus 4 cycles of preoperative AC. DFS and OS have not been shown
to be superior with the addition of docetaxel treatment in B-27.
158
A DFS
advantage was observed (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.91;
P
= .007)
favoring preoperative versus postoperative docetaxel in the subset of
patients experiencing a clinical partial response to AC.
Several chemotherapy regimens have been studied as preoperative
systemic therapy. The panel believes that the regimens recommended
in the adjuvant setting are appropriate to consider in the preoperative
systemic therapy setting. The benefits of “tailoring” preoperative
systemic therapy (ie, switching following limited response) or using