447 / 1345
IMRT versus 3D-CRT
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
bowel 30 Gy
bowel 42.75 Gy
volume in cc
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
bladder 30 Gy
bladder 42.75 Gy
0
20
40
60
80
100
rectum 30 Gy
rectum 42.72 Gy
conformal
imrt
Single institution experience
•Advantage IMRT over 3D Conformal for organ sparing
•Volume of OAR receiving high dose significantly smaller with IMRT
Van de
Bunt
2006